re-thc

12 ms·

271.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> is a marketing stunt No, it's not. If there's an issue the only issue is people taking it the wrong way. Spotify famously wrote a blog about "the Spotify model" on project management when years later they admitted i
272.
by re-thc 5mo ago
Have we lost track of what award and grants me? If taking equity stakes every place including VCs is "awarding".
273.
by re-thc 5mo ago
This is so confusing. So what happens to Gemini Code Assist plans? What do the Antigravity quotas mean per plan?
274.
by re-thc 5mo ago
AGI now surely!
275.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> Ukraine war showed that Starlink is the real deal That held before SpaceX merged X, xAI and friends. Those are bleeding way more money than Starlink can recover.
276.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> What big risk? Tesla doesn't drag everyone else down. >50% of the S&P 500 is involved with these AI providers. There will be a cascading effect.
277.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> It’s a different level of risk altogether In this case, really? Between Nvidia, Microsoft, AMD, Amazon and everyone else in that S&P 500 there's not >50% of OpenAI already? It's not that indirect. Microsoft alone is 27
278.
by re-thc 5mo ago
Exactly. Google has SpaceX stock. To make matters worse all the banks, insurers and investment firms in that S&P list are likely in there somewhere too. I'm sure I'm missing a whole lot more.
279.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> because many funds (some of whom are required to buy index stocks) think they’re horribly over valued and will tank once floating Most of S&P 500 have shares in these anyway e.g. Microsoft and OpenAI. Not really making THAT much of
280.
by re-thc 5mo ago
That's 3.0
281.
by re-thc 5mo ago
Did they just upgrade Kimi 2.5 to 2.6?
282.
by re-thc 5mo ago
I call AI on this comment
283.
by re-thc 5mo ago
Where is the AI hate? This is about “in their area”. I’m sure they don’t want phone towers, phone factories etc in their area too. I.e. they want the benefits for free.
284.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> Wouldn't work: the copyright lawsuit against Anthropic ruled that Then just make it work? Humans invented the laws, the rules, etc.
285.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> due to my family being here in Amsterdam, business being here and my future Isn't the point of YC (if you make it) that the startup and YC = your future? What do you actually want? Can't have everything.
286.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> find companies that use AWS that are spending more every single month That is likely 99% of companies using AWS. I doubt that gets anywhere though. >50% of the time the whole thing is political more than pure cost.
287.
by re-thc 5mo ago
> or posting this sentence was part of the deal to get the compute All it says is expressed interest. That's like asking a casual how are you...
288.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> that multi-million and even billion dollar tech companies don’t have perfect websites in terms of UX I would have thought it'd be the opposite. It implies have hundreds of teams and UI / UX often is "scaled" in weir
289.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> Fashion designers do indeed make clothing by hand, it's a very important part of their craft. That’s not what I said. There’s the problem. I said mass produce.
290.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> That was the point Of what? Doing Rust? Prisma Rust failed to win the benchmarks. Prisma Typescript also fails to win the benchmarks. > if the outcome remains the same Then don't drive a car. You can walk. The outcome is the sa
291.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> All designers should be able to code and do html/css. It's the medium of design. So a fashion designer can mass produce clothing? So an interior designer can build a house? This designer should has never held.
292.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> outside of winning benchmarking charts Prisma didn’t win the benchmark charts either.
293.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> sweep with Mythos to remove any existing bugs and protect it from any cybersecurity attacks Maybe Mythos went in too hard and removed the physical network too?
294.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> Yet the UK did produce Deepmind That was a long time ago. That UK is not the UK of today.
295.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> The product has always felt obvious to us: teams waste 45+ minutes per incident just context-switching between Grafana, AWS Console, PagerDuty, and Slack before they even start debugging. We collapsed that. This sounds more like a symp
296.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> To improve this, we have shipped a few UX improvements (eg. to nudge you to /clear before continuing a long stale session) Is this really an improvement? Shouldn't this be something you investigate before introducing 1M conte
297.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> When I hear: I'm not good at frontend, I'm good at backend - I'm starting to think this is not true. There's no absolute true false in anything like that. Generalization is just an easy way to reduce thinking. To ta
298.
by re-thc 6mo ago
> It doesn't really make sense since you're not going to achieve an advanced node from a standing start in a practical time frame and cost. They already announced a partnership with Intel.
299.
by re-thc 6mo ago
But they have personal superintelligence?
300.
by re-thc 6mo ago
It doesn’t do the same thing. Each has its own system prompts, tooling etc. GitHub copilot sometimes doesn’t give you the model’s full context or something else. The issue is also what does the model mean? Is Opus on Copilot the same as in

More ›