rdpickard

4 ms·

1.
by rdpickard 11y ago
That isn't the intent of my question about the warrant. As I understand it a judge would issue a warrant if there was probable cause that execution of the warrant would prove or disprove the procecution's case against a defendant.
2.
by rdpickard 11y ago
Right, that makes sense. I don't have the link handy but the aclu post from a few days ago about a method to brute force the phone by backing up and restoring disk images after a wipe seemed reasonable to me. I also think that the fact
3.
by rdpickard 11y ago
Not knowing what is on the phone is my point. The FBI is asking for a method to access information on a specific device that impacts all devices of the same type. If there is not a stated reason for positive action, this seems to be unrecon
4.
by rdpickard 11y ago
But the phone has no (additional) prosecutorial value against Farook and Apple itself is not in possession of any evidence or information that has to do with the attack, which seems to be the reason why the FBI is using the All Writs Act. W
5.
by rdpickard 11y ago
(disclaimer; not a lawyer) How do you see there being probable cause for the issuance of a warrant? My reading of the FBI-Apple-CDCal-Govt-Reply document (page 2 / line) was that there was not forthcoming or ongoing attack, but evidenc
6.
by rdpickard 12y ago
Disclaimer: I know the author. butwhy, I understand the confusion, but I believe the intent of this suggestion is to not burn time trying to get people who have not been exposed to version control systems up to speed with git. Recently I&#x