Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rcxdude
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
61.
▲
by
rcxdude
28d ago
> Artificial neural networks are already many orders of magnitude more energy intensive than natural neural networks. What metric are you using to compare? By most counts, the energy budget of an instance of an LLM in a datacenter is low
62.
▲
by
rcxdude
29d ago
Do you have any citation for thermal cycling through the range of an AC inside a house affecting the failure rate of any household goods? Based on my experience this does not seem likely to be the case: thermal effects tend to be exponentia
63.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Eh, areas where there was and is still plenty of scope to just charge for a product have also been heavily enshittified, so I don't think you can lay much blame at open source for this.
64.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
The freedoms that the GPL gives to users in effect means giving your software away for free (because any single one of them is allowed to republish it openly). I do think there is a possible alternative model which gives most of the user fr
65.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
In rust it's a lot closer to optional: you can in principle compile rust without doing any borrow checking at all (and I believe in practice mrustc does not bother to implement it, because it's primarily used for bootstrapping and
66.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I would argue it's a risk of any process that loops around itself without grounding in reality periodically.
67.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I think it's only useful as awareness that it's a thing that could happen. evidence for specific instances tends to be tenuous.
68.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Cool, but that's also not what they're doing. They are claiming the same rights you have, the main inequality is the resources to defend it in court.
69.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
When you talk about this part: >I’m definitely not allowed to scan it and post its pages online and upload them to an archive of scanned PDFs without the authors’ and publishers’ permission. That's explicitly not what they are doing
70.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Mainly because it's not very helpful for a useful discussion. If it's true, the discussion is already dead, if it's false, all it does is annoy the accused.
71.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Well, in practice shame is a local effect: it only matters if it's coming from people that you respect. Some people being angry at you in a community is going to affect you most severely when you're a member of that community: oth
72.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
That choice was also made within a framework of another system. It's systems all the way down.
73.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
This sounds like a cool science fair project being blown out of proportion by the media.
74.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
It's about how copyright law was originally conceived. It did not particularly care about what you did with the information, apart from when you copied it. Copyright is only about the right to make more copies of a work (hence the na
75.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Though it's a little circular, because this is the kinda of thing that goes into the inflation calculation.
76.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Nethack does procedural generation pretty well, and indeed roguelikes are a pretty good framework for it, because the game design tends to revolve around giving the player different options to solve a given problem and they're also not
77.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I mean, almost no games have that many meaningful dimensions in the first place. It's more likely that the correlations you add just reduce the potential for interesting combinations to arise in the first place.
78.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Reminds me of bones files in nethack.
79.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
The advice I've heard is 1) have as many different dimensions of variation as you can manage, and try to have them matter, 2) resist the urge to impart correlations into the generation, since this just reduces variety, and 3) allow you
80.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I dunno, in my experience it's often overly-narrow, sometimes jumping through all kinds of hoops to preserve some edge-case behaviour that doesn't matter because I didn't mention it could be changed.
81.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I don't think that's accurate. What I've seen described is actually a surprisingly porous line: The Russians are often behind the Ukrainians and vice-versa, but it doesn't result in a break due to the transparency of t
82.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
The drones are obviously very important but they only work in the context of everything else on and around the battlefield, especially people. You aren't holding the line with drones alone, and on the whole they are not autonomous.
83.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Eh, it seems like it's pretty necessary for success on such a problem (but obviously not sufficient). These problems gain a reputation, and you either get judged for it or get too much attention for it.
84.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
The solution to misleading reports about your software isn't more opacity, though, quite the opposite. If they were transparent about what they were doing then there would be much less room for speculation and misleading reports. (And
85.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I think that depends a lot on what density of particles is required, and how they are distributed in the atmosphere. Intuitively actually turning the whole atmosphere into something like smog would also be pretty difficult, so I would not b
86.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Eh, In my experience this is not a clean distinction. My work is generally described as engineering and it often involves discovering new things about the technology, with a similar level of uncertainty. (and it often needs to be a lot more
87.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
They are pretty infamously overly verbose.
88.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Exactly. This control-freak nature of manufacturers is sadly what makes me cheer for the security holes much of the time.
89.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
There are techniques to speed up the search for RSA keys quite significantly: they don't scale as with a pure brute force search, nor with a very useful rule of thumb (it's not even the case that doubling the RSA key length double
90.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
If there's evidence they deliberately did this, yes. If they've lied in other cases then it might make their testimony that they didn't intend this less credible, but also OpenAI as a whole is not going to face criminal charg
More ›