Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rcxdude
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
91.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
You can imagine what you like. I can imagine a million examples of people being judged not guilty because intent could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. There are of course many injustices in the 'justice' system, but I wou
92.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Expecting to go from having seen no code to being able to code within a context window is a pretty high bar. More useful would be asking for code that does something you're pretty confident no-one has done before. (TBH, when people cla
93.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Their solution to that is to either use the cell phone network or services like amazon sidewalk where they connect in through your (or a neighbour's) internet-connected device.
94.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
There are many issues with OpenAI but the two situations are pretty significantly different.
95.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
How so? In my experience academics are far more likely to sweep big practical issues under the rug because they're primarily concerned with being something working one so they can write a paper, as opposed to making a product that has
96.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Hmmm, I don't think that's necessarily true. Often times once I have witnessed a bug, I have found it just by reading through the code with the behaviour of the bug in mind. For LLMs, this is likely to be disproportionately effect
97.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
TBH I don't think it's that bad: the article is not hard to read and pretty informative (and is not just a copy + paste from a prompt), it's just got a hint of that tone which can grate just because it's rendered so clic
98.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Funnily enough the legal system has dealt with people lying about their intentions before.
99.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
> The intention was implicit when there is economic gain to be had. Not how it works. Intent requires at least that you were deliberately doing the criminal act (sometimes also that you knew it was criminal, or at least that you had some
100.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Intent of the user.
101.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Sure, I'll agree it's often obtuse, I'm just saying it does communicate some information, however poorly.
102.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
It's a very idiosyncratic (and often irritating) style, but I don't find it particularly difficult to understand. It's not meaningless, just weirdly phrased.
103.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
LLMs get a lot of finetuning, but I suspect there are two things that can cause this kind of writing: Firstly, some parts of the RLHF involve human graders on the LLM's performance. I suspect their general bias towards a punchy, persua
104.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I think anyone claiming 100% accuracy is wrong, but the recent Claude models, for example, have a writing style that is sufficiently distinct that claiming people can't recognize it is like claiming you can't recognize the styles
105.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I think nowadays defeating the detection probably looks like finetuning a smaller LLM and getting it to paraphrase the text from the other one (or just using a more obscure finetune: it'll probably have its own cliches and habits but i
106.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I do think there is a tendency to over-index on one or two particularly straightforward tells, and for any given feature of LLM writing you can find places where people do also use that feature (they had to learn it from somewhere, and in a
107.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I don't think this is about edge cases where someone has successfully disguised the writing to some degree: the current crop of LLMs have some pretty blatant (and frankly annoying) habits by default, ones that are hard to miss once you
108.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
It's less about the IP ranges they're giving out not overlapping and more about the requests that they respond to not overlapping (or at least that they don't contradict one another). The classic 'someone plugged a consu
109.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Hmmm, In my experience programmers are often not particularly good at networking, and this can result in all kinds of bad assumptions (or awkward workarounds for things that could be much better solved at the network level).
110.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
>which is arguably quite an effective way to distribute limited resources to the public. I would argue in a lot of cases it isn't: especially in cases where the resources are intended to go to people who are struggling in some way.
111.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
TBH these rights have been pretty easy to assert beforehand: I've told multiple friends complaining about their landlords what rights they do have and that in a lot of cases they can assert them by inaction (normally, not signing a con
112.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
The UK rental rights don't really have rent controls as they're normally conceived: the two limits are rent can only go up once a year and that it must be roughly in line with similar properties in the market or area, i.e. explici
113.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Ah, I see, an argument that there was gender discrimination in pay for 'equal value' jobs despite the actual job being different. I agree this decision seems like a bit of a strange reach, but it's far from saying it abolishe
114.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
The US has things like the right to a speedy trial.
115.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
>The employment rights legislation we have at the moment literally abolishes the market for labour - the final decision as to if your salary is "fair" is made by a judge. Can you explain this? I can't find anything on this
116.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
I think generally the point of the phrasing is to make you stop considering it a bug,
117.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
How so? It's pretty within the format IMO.
118.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
Switches and firewalls can do all kinds of things. Probably the most common case is that public/guest wifi networks often have client isolation set up so that different devices on the network can't contact each other. Same subnet,
119.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
The ordering is stupid because some of them are named by the number of bits and some of them are named by the number of decimal digits. They are in order of size and this is the largest one so far, despite the confusing names.
120.
▲
by
rcxdude
1mo ago
With a base station in a known position you can get to cm resolution with somewhat pricey but decidedly hobbyist-accessible gear: https://www.sparkfun.com/sparkfun-gps-rtk-sma-breakout-zed-f...
More ›