rboug

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rboug 1y ago

   Thank you! Really appreciate this. I’ll prioritize the citations/ranges table in /methodology to make this properly citable and easier to audit.
2. 2.▲
   by rboug 1y ago

   Another quick note - this is a work-in-progress. The goal of the project is to inform public discussion with sourced, reviewable numbers. The “live counters” are there to make scale/salience tangible, not to be sensational. I know it’s
3. 3.▲
   by rboug 1y ago

   > On “sources” Each of the above pulls from operator sustainability reports, industry surveys/benchmarks, grid datasets (national/regional emission factors), and academic studies for water/energy intensities and inference
4. 4.▲
   by rboug 1y ago

   Thank you for your msg. Short answers below; happy to go deeper. > CO2 (PPAs/RECs) - We currently use location-based grid factors (national/regional) and do not net out PPAs/RECs. That is the conservative choice for a publ
5. 5.▲
   Show HN: TheAIMeters – Live AI impact (water, electricity, CO2, etc.)(theaimeters.com)

   2 points by rboug 1y ago|6 comments