rbinv

32 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   I disagree. Google's Webmaster Tools are not really that complex, and while the UI could use some polishing here and there, it works just fine. AdWords has way more features, of course. However, it's still pretty usable in my opin
2. 332.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   Unbearable scrolling behavior in Chrome on a late 2013 MBP.
3. 333.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   What's up with the all caps "FROM" and "TO"? SQL habit?
4. 334.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   Honestly: just start (with low weights). That's what I did, anyway. Work your way up and focus on proper form.
5. 335.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   How did you happen to take NSI-189? Were you part of the phase 1 trial?
6. 336.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   > Get off your high horse. The irony.
7. 337.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   Pretty sure he was being sarcastic.
8. 338.▲
   by rbinv 11y ago

   You might be thinking of CT scans? MRI scans should be harmless.
9. 339.▲
   AMP Project’s fast mobile pages coming to Google Search(insidesearch.blogspot.com)

   1 points by rbinv 11y ago|0 comments
10. 340.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Soon: "Google is proud to introduce Markov chain advertorials."
11. 341.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    You are correct. Guess I read too much into "verification".
12. 342.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Yes, I do find the title to be misleading. Pure checksum verification (used for some account number plausibility checks) can actually be done in a couple of lines of code. This is something different entirely. Please don't get me wrong
13. 343.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Kind of misleading: this works with a few lines of code _if_ you use/include their libary. Nice nonetheless.
14. 344.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    But maybe you just frequent one particular café when you're in a good and productive mood to begin with ;-)
15. 345.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Agreed. This is the problem with pretty much all "health trackers": how actionable are the data and visualization? Yes, you need to measure stuff to improve it, but still, a step counter is like a website hit counter and has littl
16. 346.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    I agree completely. GA has become very, very capable in the last five years or so. Combined with their current APIs, you can do pretty much anything you want.
17. 347.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Sorry, I was not aware of that feature.
18. 348.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Piwik relies on client-side JavaScript for tracking, not log analysis.
19. 349.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Free alternatives? Not really. Paid? Yes, SiteCatalyst and Webtrekk come to mind. People seem to ignore that the tracking JavaScript is not what you're paying for. It's the backend + servers.
20. 350.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    > It took us only a few weeks to write our home-brew analytics package. Unfortunately, there's no way to replicate what Google Analytics currently offers (for free!) within a couple of weeks (or even months). Not with big data sets.
21. 351.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    I don't think one more week would have made that much of a difference (rather than, say, a couple of months). Seems like they came up with a solid solution anyway.
22. 352.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Cool insight, thanks for that. How long (on average) does a delivery take once you pickup the processed order from Starbucks? Have you guys measured any significant differences in temperature?
23. 353.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    There are actually no direct links to Amazon (or other similar sites) in his blog posts. Parent meant other commentators in this thread.
24. 354.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    What does that have to do with anything? IPv6 does not mean static IPs for everyone forever.
25. 355.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Do you actually know that fingerprinting is used or is just an assumption?
26. 356.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Personally, I think the pricing is way too high for what you're providing. Also, to people who think that this very JS might get blocked by ad blockers: all of the tracking and reporting could be done (server-side) with Google Analytic
27. 357.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    If cookieless, how do you accurately aggregate/assign pageviews per visitor?
28. 358.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    I can't help but think that this was at least in part created to help train Google's image recognition software (as in, confirm that the images returned are correct).
29. 359.▲
    Easily get back to the images you’ve found on Google(insidesearch.blogspot.com)

    2 points by rbinv 11y ago|1 comments
30. 360.▲
    by rbinv 11y ago

    Thanks for elaborating. What do you mean by them "fixing their product"? Make it self-hosted/server-side?