razemio

7 ms·

61.
by razemio 2y ago
Haha :). I would have liked this name.
62.
by razemio 2y ago
Why does full mean to you never to interact with the car. This would mean L5 driving. They never claimed that. Even the mercedes system which is L4 is only working under certain conditions. All the names you have given suggest, that it is n
63.
by razemio 2y ago
Again. Present a name, which fits and describes the capabilities of FSD. It can under certain circumstances drive a route completely on its own. This is not a lane assist, not (advanced) Cruise Control, not HDA and not Super Cruise.
64.
by razemio 2y ago
This isn't true. The autopilot in a plane does nothing but keeping it's course. In this regard it does less than cruise control. It will not even disengage if you forget it is turned on some planes. TCAS will warn you ahead of tim
65.
by razemio 2y ago
Not sure about other countries but in Germany L4 is only active on freeways up to certain speeds. The video you linked is not showing this. At least the parts where I skipped through.
66.
by razemio 2y ago
Automatic means something different. Here is the definition of what an autopilot is: The autopilot controls the watercraft or spacecraft without the need for constant manual control by a human. Autopilots do not replace the human operator,
67.
by razemio 2y ago
Why is it named like this on ships or planes then? You most certainly need to intervene, when other vehicles are approaching. Just because this happens less in those environments, the name autopilot certainly fits. If you go back in history
68.
by razemio 2y ago
It most certainly is. Is it reliable? No, not at all. However there are many YouTube channels showing certain routes, where this car is capable from driving itself from a to b without the need of manual intervention. Including parking.
69.
by razemio 2y ago
Why? It is capable of full self driving. That has been proven numerous times. It is however not capable to do this all time. I ask again, give a better name that describes the function FSD currently offers. It is most certainly not a lane a
70.
by razemio 2y ago
I think I already had this discussion on HN. I am not sure why most people think autopilot is hands of the wheel without looking. There literally is no autopilot, which does not require constant attention from a human. This is true for plan
71.
by razemio 2y ago
I distrust those benchmarks after working with sonnet for half a year now. Many OpenAI models beat Sonnet on paper. This seems to be the case because it's strength (agent, visual, caching) aren't being used, I guess? Otherwise the
72.
by razemio 2y ago
React in my experience sucks with AI. In fact I have not yet encountered a "heavy" framework which works well. Use something light like svelte. Typed programming languages like Typescript, Scala, Haskell and so on will produce mor
73.
by razemio 2y ago
Can you clarify what tools and programming language you use? If find that the issue often is wrong tooling, exotic programming languages or frameworks.
74.
by razemio 2y ago
Sadly only my personal experience across multiple years. I think I was selfhosting my mail for about 5 years. Multiple Hetzner root servers using mailinabox and later mailcow. All self checks green.
75.
by razemio 2y ago
With fine you mean not in the SPAM folder the first time? That would be an improvement. Also works for Microsoft services?
76.
by razemio 2y ago
Maybe it is (was?) a German problem. Here are some providers I know which Autoblock custom servers: * web.de * gmx.net I also have to say that I always used a hetzner root server. Moved multiple times due to an upgrade. I ALWAYS had to manu
77.
by razemio 2y ago
This FAQ is in complete disregard of reality. Almost all IP ranges of server providers are blocked. Getting a clean IP is close to impossible. Big providers often only support their own forms and ignore open sources trust providers. Small p
78.
by razemio 2y ago
Yep, this did not work. I tried for several years. The only thing that worked was manually filling out the required forms. Not sure if it changed lately. Out of the self host mail business for some years.
79.
by razemio 2y ago
I tried for several years. There where to many issues. Even a perfectly configured mail server landed in spam folders of smaller providers. Had to constantly whitelist my server manually with the big providers. For 1-8 dollars a month, it w
80.
by razemio 2y ago
I asked if speaking in German would be possible and the result was if someone is trying to speak German without knowing any word. However, I asked if a german sentence could be repeated after me and it was insanely good. Impressive tech!
81.
by razemio 2y ago
I am not (only) a docker dev but a developer using docker tooling for my development environment. Feature wise docker and flatpak are not even comparable IMO. Just wanted to make a point, why flatpak is not (yet) an option for some people,
82.
by razemio 2y ago
I think this depends on your use case. As a dev I would take dockerized gui applications over flatpak all day, as it allows me to quickly add additional packages and networking for example. The possibilities would be endless while all can r
83.
by razemio 2y ago
Since this needs 3d acceleration I would guess this does not work? Waydroid is insanely good with this (when it is running).
84.
by razemio 2y ago
TFT from Riot Games would be a good example. Protected by Vanguard so you can not use wine. However you need an arm device, since they do not publish apks for x86.
85.
by razemio 2y ago
I ignored those, since the starship at this stage can be considered a prototype. I am just trying to argue, that calling SpaceX unreliable, especially compared to its competitors and time to market, is bold.
86.
by razemio 2y ago
Can you name a space company with less failures? Also I think it is unfair to even compare SpaceX to anything else, because of the insane amount of starts / tests combined unparalleled creativity. According to this website their curren
87.
by razemio 2y ago
In Germany you can use the website BUT you still need the app for 2fa. SMS is no longer an option for most banks, because it is considered insecure. Same goes for TOTP since this can easily be replicated, if you have access to the device ge
88.
by razemio 2y ago
How can you trust any mainstream "working" iPhone or Android device? You already mentioned open source android distros. You mean those where no banking or streaming device app works because you have to use a replacement for gapps
89.
by razemio 2y ago
You misunderstood me. I am grateful they are sharing the source code for review. My problem is with the wording. Open source means something different by definition. If they leave this project in the dust and someone else continues to maint
90.
by razemio 2y ago
It is a 100% not open-source. It won't be maintained besides pull-requests AND if another company or individual develops this further, it can not be used commercially by anybody else but the company who released this. It this fair? Ope

More ›