ravanave

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by ravanave 6y ago

   Btw, the reason Haskell isn’t used more isn’t type system per se, as all types can be inferred at the compilation time. People would sometimes use this feature even to see if GHCi guesses the type correctly (by correctly I mean exactly how
2. 2.▲
   by ravanave 6y ago

   Technical content is generally of much higher standard. Although HackerNews sometimes feels a bit like an echo chamber with the type of content that gets popular. I think there’s just too many crypto-sceptics here, and that’s a shame becaus
3. 3.▲
   by ravanave 11y ago

   Of course, there does not have to be, but if there would then it would be very useful. Think MS-DOS 4.0 multitasking: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS-DOS_4.0_(multitasking) One process can have a preemptive multitaski
4. 4.▲
   by ravanave 11y ago

   "A SPNT OS has no real need of a scheduler." I would rather disagree: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_multitasking . OS in the most of the cases needs to be interactive, what would be impossible without