ratww

29 ms·

301.
by ratww 4y ago
Even under communism the collective ownership was for the "means of production", not for they call "personal property" aka "things you bought".
302.
by ratww 4y ago
Thanks for doing a great job. I really hate most of the software I have to use these days, but Mattermost is one of the few exceptions. It is fast, it isn't intrusive, it respects me and my time, all while doing what it promises. To me
303.
by ratww 4y ago
Once again, I never said anything about this "theory", pal. Stop implying that I did. If you gotta restort to mocking, attacking others and putting words in their mouths to "win" an argument others aren't even parti
304.
by ratww 4y ago
Yep. We often talk about enterprise software, and how it's often bad and, has superfluous features and almost no UX design because it is made for buyers rather than for the real users. Well, guess what. We're the users now.
305.
by ratww 4y ago
One popular solution for that is having a {{See Wiktionary}} tag on the top of the article that adds the text 'For a definition of the term "Stolperstein", see the Wiktionary entry Stolperstein.'
306.
by ratww 4y ago
If developer time were really such a huge priority, we would also prioritise moving away from slow-ass compilers/transpilers, frameworks so slow that affect local development, slow IDEs and developer tools, slow CIs. And yet we don&#x2
307.
by ratww 4y ago
And every user that runs their software is also probably a bit less productive than they could be, since they have to wait around.
308.
by ratww 4y ago
I also share your experience. Never saw management or PO complaining about developers taking time to optimise. I actually never even saw an experienced developer taking an inordinate time to optimise something. It's always refactoring
309.
by ratww 4y ago
Doesn't cargo-bundle do that? I haven't tried to use it to generate .msi files, only for iOS/macOS, but it has the feature!
310.
by ratww 4y ago
I wonder if we're being too quick to blame him for the Butterfly keyboard. Sure it was his design, but there were engineering issue. Was Ive powerful enough to overrule Tim Cook and everyone else and keep a faulty keyboard for that lon
311.
by ratww 4y ago
Once again, I don't give a shit about your link or what you have to say, so good luck in life.
312.
by ratww 4y ago
Quit your bullshit. I never said swear words were a problem anywhere. Trough this discussion you keep misrepresenting what me and another poster have said to match your silly fantasy narrative. You've been caught being disrespectful, p
313.
by ratww 4y ago
You called other member here some terrible stuff that was uncalled for, and now you're suggesting they're advertising drugs on HN. You're a troll, and you're being asshole to another member. I don't care about your
314.
by ratww 4y ago
You're clearly trolling. You so far called the OP of this thread (who is a member here), "rando spammer", "misguided", "naive" and "fucking idiot". Considering that that it seems even a Microsoft
315.
by ratww 4y ago
The problem is not humour, and I didn't say that anywhere, but rather the sarcastic pedantry at the expense of other people who might not be native speakers. Again, humour is not a problem, but your post is also not funny. I explained
316.
by ratww 4y ago
Illegal can have multiple definitions, and some advertisement can be illegal. No, it's not a shame. Mocking someone because their wording is imprecise is a bit shameful, though. Also against the HN guidelines. You can do better.
317.
by ratww 4y ago
This part of the macOS developer community bootstrapped itself. Apple at the time was trying to sell Java WebObjects and Carbon/Cocoa in public. The proximity with Linux was an accident. NeXT is from the late 80s, pre Linux, and NeXT w
318.
by ratww 4y ago
In the real world there is stuff that is illegal and some of those things can be in image format. And the part that sucks is clearly the retaliation from whoever it was.
319.
by ratww 4y ago
At least they know where OP works. Or maybe not anymore since he's banned from LinkedIn.
320.
by ratww 4y ago
Also lots of companies are mining data from Linkedin and building email databases. As soon as Linkedin knows I switched companies I start receiving a deluge of spam on "guessed" emails (first_name@company.com, first_name.last_name
321.
by ratww 4y ago
Educational images of drugs definitely aren't illegal, but OP is clearly talking about advertisement for illegal drugs in image format.
322.
by ratww 4y ago
I think everyone else is also "clueless" about it, I don't think the jury is out for the possibilities you can have as a Linkedin influencer. Some people seem to be advertising their coaching services (for example: by targeti
323.
by ratww 4y ago
It is definitely possible to have determinism in a CI build step, and it's possible to have checks for it. If one needs determinism and a cache, they can store the files on S3 or some other place instead of git. Re-generating the fil
324.
by ratww 4y ago
Actually 3 standards, AU, plus VST2 and VST3 which have different APIs. One of the advantages of CLAP would be Midi 2.0 support. But given that VST3 recently released support for Midi 2.0, that's a fair question.
325.
by ratww 4y ago
Image Line (makers of FL Studio) are in the "are already evaluating CLAP" list, so they're not already supporting.
326.
by ratww 4y ago
Convolution Reverb was definitely practical on CPUs for much longer than 10 years, and a lot of people were using it, even on underpowered computers (I was using a base model Macbook Air myself since 2011, and yes, LOTS of long reverbs).
327.
by ratww 4y ago
Incorrect. For those add-ins, IE11 support was required until recently, and there was a real review process, and it was actually pretty good. They even reported very subtle IE11 visual bugs to us.
328.
by ratww 4y ago
Just in case you haven’t heard: Microsoft recently announced that they won’t hold it against you if you drop support for IE11 in add-ins. Your customers might still complain, though. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-US/off
329.
by ratww 4y ago
Yep, exactly. That's what the grandparent post [1] meant with "Because a lot of men like to swipe right on nearly everyone and buy passes which get them unlimited swipes". This is where the majority of Tinder's money is
330.
by ratww 4y ago
Again, nobody is "saying no repeatedly" to anyone, because the app works by swiping and matchmaking. There are no conversations without matches, so there's no "tired, desperate women" that got "rejected" b

More ›