rasur

18 ms·

151.
by rasur 12y ago
Is there a git repo anywhere, out of curiousity? (Perhaps I'm being blind?) This looks interesting..
152.
by rasur 12y ago
Insert Obligatory 'Diamond Age' reference here. EDIT: Yes well for those who haven't read the book the reference is to the sexual transmission of data. Implied (but not confirmed) by nano-tech, however no implementation detai
153.
by rasur 12y ago
Nice! Please do alert us when it appears on github. I'm sure there will be interest. EDIT: In fact if you can announce your github id now/soon people can start watching in earnest.
154.
by rasur 12y ago
That rings bells, but I think there were some others too - sigh my memory :/
155.
by rasur 12y ago
Yeah, I'm with you on that TBH. There's nothing like a good bit of condescension from a developer to really win over their users. It was sad a few decades ago, and it's still sad now.
156.
by rasur 12y ago
This is a great tutorial, although the one complaint I had was the errors in the pdf version (can't remember the specifics).. took me a while to realise the html version was far superior. Regardless of my complaints, it was an interest
157.
by rasur 12y ago
I think things will get more interesting when Oculus, Meta, Magic Leap and others get a little bit more entrenched (ass-u-me'ing it happens!).. give it another 10 years or so.. ;)
158.
by rasur 12y ago
Someone endowed of clue should get going with a kickstarter for at least a film version of TDA, if not a lot of what was described therein :) Damn, I'm going to have to read it again now. Still, it's about time for a refresh...
159.
by rasur 12y ago
Have you not read 'The Diamond Age'? IMO it is one of his best works. Nanotech/Networks/Crypto for the masses to understand. I read, loved and was caught up in the VR fever of the 90's via Snow Crash, and love his o
160.
by rasur 12y ago
Or out of their Tiefgarage - can you imagine the fun ;)
161.
by rasur 12y ago
"I think it boils down to three things: the maker’s schedule, the sleepy brain and bright computer screens." I think a lot of it boils down to being expected to perform in really noisy not-conducive-to-thinking environments (yes,
162.
by rasur 12y ago
I get your point but fwiw Emacs in a modern mac terminal is not completely horrible to look at.
163.
by rasur 12y ago
Some quite delicious Cheeses contain mould :) (although once, many years ago, I did do a blue cheese sauce to a meal, and gave myself and my wife a spectacular night and next day of... ejecta . Never going to forget that experience :( )
164.
by rasur 12y ago
This is Gold, if only for the info about temp/transitory files and resultant image size.
165.
by rasur 12y ago
So how does this compare to somerthing like Sysdig, for example?
166.
by rasur 12y ago
Did you ever catch a look at (or play with) OpenCroquet (which then morphed into OpenCobalt and... kinda stalled, from what I can gather). Croquet was this (but without the Oculus) in 2007. I miss it, but it went nowhere, but.. that's
167.
by rasur 12y ago
Switzerland too. (~80% previous salary)
168.
by rasur 12y ago
I'll have to set something up that actually uses cgi-bin. However, my load-balancer would still kill the request, I suspect. (EDIT: Sorry.. my point being; your site should probably class 400's as 'safe'?)
169.
by rasur 12y ago
When the system you're testing replies with a '400 Bad request' (as mine do ;) ), you're probably in "safe" territory, no?
170.
by rasur 12y ago
"Everyone will get real security once hackers start targeting private equity and hedge funds." I'd like to think you're right, but.. I don't think 'Everyone' will really include _everyone_. Maybe 'Eve
171.
by rasur 12y ago
Haskell: Predator self-defense tool ;)
172.
by rasur 12y ago
Yup, agreed. I wasn't clear, but I was thinking/ass-u-me'ing that it would be an entity that would try to act responsibly.
173.
by rasur 12y ago
There should be some kind of anonymizing escrow-type service that allows people/info.sec researchers to help companies with security issues (or am I being woefully slow, and there already exists such a thing? This was just a OTTOMH&#x2
174.
by rasur 12y ago
Interesting! I did not know that. Thanks for the heads up, I shall investigate further :)
175.
by rasur 12y ago
Not really having paid much attention to how they did do their catalogs in the past, I just kind of presumed they were moving towards 3D instead of 'real' photography.. and I guess my assumption has been proved right (makes sense
176.
by rasur 12y ago
> I do foresee a significant drop in overall productivity in the area for a longer period though. True, though there are a lot of people working in that area. Deaths at the wrong time could be catastrophic.
177.
by rasur 12y ago
Perhaps the people down-voting you might like to share _why_ they think you said something wrong. FWIW, I would tend to agree - in general terms.
178.
by rasur 12y ago
That's really pretty impressive work. Will be interesting to see the fruits of their labours at smaller (and larger) scales.
179.
by rasur 12y ago
>for hiding encrypted information inside images. otherwise known as Steganography.
180.
by rasur 12y ago
I wish people would learn to fucking swear properly. That fucking title is not completely fucking perfect. /s

More ›