Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rany_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
18 ms
·
211.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
> Obviously it is wrong to create child porn intentionally. But that's already illegal and people who do this are laughably bad at ITSEC. That's because you're reading about the dumb CP producers that got caught.... who by
212.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
I sure hope they aren't that cheap.
213.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Everything should be served securely these days. Prior to HTTPS being absolutely king, ISPs here used to inject EXEs with malware and do all sorts of nasty stuff. With HTTPS dominating they don't do that sort of thing anymore as the sh
214.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
How are they doing SSL certificate management on an ESP32? Their article at https://khalsalabs.com/hosting-a-website-on-esp32-webserver-... makes no mention of how that would work, only really basic code for a static cleart
215.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
They do on Android.
216.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Is it a good idea to use quantum resistant crypto algorithm on-top of more established/widespread algorithms like RSA/ECDSA? I don't feel comfortable using quantum resistant crypto due to how cutting edge it all is.
217.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
It seems like it uses a different ranking system. Edit: found this answer from an older post, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1833242
218.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
I just felt that Qualcomm would have an edge over Apple given Qualcomm's experience developing ARM chips for decades at this point. It was more that I assumed that Qualcomm had some kind of killer chip in reserve in case a competitor s
219.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Apple is basically competing against itself at this point. Somewhat disappointed of Qualcomm and MediaTek though, they're all mediocre by comparison. I would have expected them to wipe the floor with Apple, but seems like Apple chips a
220.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
For me this line of thinking doesn't make a lot of sense. The Google Play option will always exist as it is a prerequisite for widespread adoption on Android. Also arguably, you're safer on F-Droid due to the level of vetting on t
221.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Their reasoning for having it Play Store only is that Google does not require app developers to provide their signing keys/sign the APK themselves. Now this is no longer the case as Google changed their policies. NOTE: F-Droid does not
222.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
I never understood the idea behind that. One can simply record the deepfaked content to have it "cryptographically blessed." That's what people still do to bypass DRM (just recording a screen) and it works so well that you ca
223.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Isn't it common for smartphone makers to pull this sort of thing on Android? Basically the factory OS would overheat in order to do well in benchmarks but a subsequent update would later get it to throttle to prevent it from frying its
224.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
> Nevertheless, the company signed a power purchase agreement with Helion, a fusion startup founded by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman earlier this year, with the hopes of buying electricity from it as soon as 2028. Except that's not actually
225.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
I've found GCP to be extremely expensive bandwidth wise, however the network is also really good. So I suppose it's understandable that they'd charge a premium.
226.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Some have speculated that this is why https://old.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/16to3w3/it_has_fina... stopped working. I think this is a more reasonable motive than what is being discussed right now in t
227.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
> If there is space for 3.5mm you might have a point. I don't think you get it. The reason why there isn't any space for 3.5mm now is because they didn't want to add it, they could add the space if they so choose. This i
228.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
It is true though, lest we forget that Samsung managed to make the Galaxy S5 IP67 water resistant... this phone meanwhile is IP57 rated, which is actually even worse. If they tell you "it's harder with the headphone jack" tha
229.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
A method to permanently activate Windows and Office based on the unique hardware ID was patched, however methods that require installation like KMS and KMS38 activators are still working. What HWID activators allowed was for activation to p
230.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Writes to a temporary file and compiles it: https://github.com/alexandru-dinu/igcc/blob/84f68c7056d0d996...
231.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
I guess it's a gamble on whether you could gain users faster than you'd be losing them. Either way I don't think this can be the case with Unity due to how niche their product is with many alternatives (including free ones).
232.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Replying to myself but also, they could easily trick you into clicking some link and exploiting you that way. HTTP isn't the issue here, it's just being exploited so they don't have to get you to click some link. In all likel
233.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
You'd still need to resist the urge to not press "allow me anyway" and to be honest, even I'd click it knowing the risk (I just want to visit the damn site!). This doesn't solve anything unless the prompt is extreme
234.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
That still requires a leap of faith to a relatively small company. Even if true, they could always secretly activate logging without your knowledge.
235.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
If it weren't for CVEs it would be a lot more difficult to convince management to update the codebase and get rid of legacy crap even though I'm fully aware that almost all the CVEs don't apply to our project. It's just
236.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Looking at their post history, I think they're being sincere here and this is not AI generated.
237.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
It's more like they leverage it for diplomacy. The auditing means nothing really, it's being given to authoritarian government like Saudi Arabia as long as they are OK with Israel existing. The bar to get access to NSO tools is to
238.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
I don't know about weekly but the security record seems alright for something as complex as curl: https://curl.se/docs/security.html
239.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
Maybe but given that this is implemented in the driver tells me that there might be some kind of issue with it being implemented on the GPU. I doubt they chose this less than optimal way of implementing such a limitation because they were s
240.
▲
by
rany_
3y ago
> CUDA, and pretty much all optimization(hacks) done to run games better And arbitrary limitations implemented at the driver level to force you to purchase their enterprise GPUs, see https://github.com/keylase/nvidia
More ›