rany_

18 ms·

241.
by rany_ 3y ago
I'll add "for desktop users" as that's my only experience with it. I haven't used it for compute.
242.
by rany_ 3y ago
It is worth mentioning that their open-sourced driver is not the same codebase as their proprietary driver, it is inferior in performance for desktop/gaming users. So it is not really a complete alternative yet. Either way as you menti
243.
by rany_ 3y ago
That's only for a small subset of their more recent GPUs, as you can see here: https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules#compatible... Also it's not the same codebase as their proprietary driver, it i
244.
by rany_ 3y ago
I find it disgusting that most people here are defending NVIDIA. This is literally victim blaming; Linux devs are victims of license/contract violation. NVIDIA has no right to be doing this and are acting above the law. The kernel devs
245.
by rany_ 3y ago
Not necessarily, Google has access to the developer's private key they use for signing their APKs so they could just make a fake release that has a bigger version number than the current version whenever a rollback is needed. No change
246.
by rany_ 3y ago
This too conspiratorial for me, they could have easily figured out your intentions via other means. Before jumping to this conclusion, I think it is worth sending messages about topics that are legitimately random and you have never searche
247.
by rany_ 3y ago
At least they can't be sued for false advertising. That's unfortunately commendable these days.
248.
by rany_ 3y ago
8 jobs for COBOL is really high relative to Java, where is that?
249.
by rany_ 3y ago
It's probably because the env from the host system is sandboxed. You should explicitly set the DISPLAY somehow when you run the snap
250.
by rany_ 3y ago
I don't believe that's the goal they set out for themselves; and besides I feel like it should at least be as POSIX compatible as they could make it. They could drop POSIX oddities where they see fit, but POSIX is not all insane.
251.
by rany_ 3y ago
No, I mean creating some kind of quick program from the prompt itself. Like for instance bulk renaming of files from the prompt, there is no way I could do that quickly in fish's language and having to switch to bash to do that would b
252.
by rany_ 3y ago
The biggest screw up is that fish is not bash compatible. I'm just too used to bash and am not willing to change that because there are corporate systems where I only have access to bash and nothing else; and cannot install fish. It wi
253.
by rany_ 3y ago
A month ago it didn't work that way. You used to be able to disable watch history and have it base recommendations on your subscriptions, liked/disliked content, etc.
254.
by rany_ 3y ago
Well, you could make the argument that during the 2000-2020s the US was at war with undeveloped countries that definitely had no chance of dethroning the US technologically; this is different because China is in a position to do just that.
255.
by rany_ 3y ago
It isn't, I really wish that instead of wiping DECADES of history; it only applies to content that was archived from the day of the domain's registration. I think this is slightly more reasonable, but I imagine they simply don&#x2
256.
by rany_ 3y ago
When they don't get the code upstream, it's usually because they know the code doesn't pass the stringent requirements for upstreaming and don't want to get embarrassed during review. What you do get in that case is code
257.
by rany_ 3y ago
I've never had to install their application on my machine. The web version performs works well for me, if anything it performs better than their app ever did.
258.
by rany_ 3y ago
I think so, given that it mentions the case of the client being a paying customer: > 31.3 Data Processing Addendum. If you are a business, enterprise, or education account owner and your use of the Services requires Zoom to process an En
259.
by rany_ 3y ago
I personally use Qalculate ( https://qalculate.github.io/ ), specifically their CLI version for this purpose. I'm not sure how well it compares to GNU Units, but it works well enough for my needs; and it's fairly si
260.
by rany_ 3y ago
This is what malicious compliance looks like.
261.
by rany_ 3y ago
Their speed test service isn't very accurate either, its always over reporting by a factor of 100Mbit/s for me (vnstat running at the time of the test shows this). The JavaScript tests in general are not very useful IMO.
262.
by rany_ 3y ago
Also dependency graph is enabled by default. So there's that.
263.
by rany_ 3y ago
I am not disagreeing with you but by your own admission it does not read your code; only the project's manifest. THEN why on Earth do they ask for so much more when all they need to do is bump some dependency version in the manifest. A
264.
by rany_ 3y ago
Yes, https://rossmanngroup.com/ > Come to our store (Austin, TX) or mail your device to us and we will fix your problem!
265.
by rany_ 3y ago
GitHub owns the Copilot model; it is based on OpenAI's Codex but they own and operate it themselves. So technically feeding it into their AI would be OK by those terms. That's why Copilot still exists even after Codex was killed o
266.
by rany_ 3y ago
He operates a business, so that's not surprising.
267.
by rany_ 3y ago
I'd like them to limit the scope of the data use to dependency graph ONLY and for it to not be stored. I swear this goes without saying.. but these blanket self granted permissions on the part of GitHub are a serious breach of trust. T
268.
by rany_ 3y ago
So give them an inch (Dep Graph feature) and they'll take a mile (loss of confidentiality); that's not any better...
269.
by rany_ 3y ago
Yes, but that is the standard Terms of Service which applies to public repositories as well. The terms appear the same as the public repositories; there doesn't appear to be a carve out.
270.
by rany_ 3y ago
> Private repository data is scanned by machine and never read by GitHub staff. Human eyes will never see the contents of your private repositories, except as described in our Terms of Service. > > Your individual personal or repos

More ›