rantwasp

49 ms·

481.
by rantwasp 6y ago
2000$ is a lot of traffic. way more than any side project would have. I guess that if you are at a point where you are making decisions like you needed to you are out of the “easiest way to setup a static website” territory. I would be curi
482.
by rantwasp 6y ago
let’s talk numbers. how much egress traffic would you have? at 10GB per month you pay 0.8$/month yes the traffic it costs extra, but a static website should not be GB (or even MB) in size. Also, if you have a lot of traffic you should
483.
by rantwasp 6y ago
AWS S3 + Cloudfront. The initial setup can be a little finicky, but once you do get it setup, the rest of the time you only do an S3 sync from your local dir to the S3 bucket. It will also be stupid fast (cloudfront is edge networks) + hav
484.
by rantwasp 6y ago
yeah no. even if it gets wildly popular over night you'll only pay a few dollars
485.
by rantwasp 6y ago
i guess. for the person paying the tax it makes little difference though. I think the predictably and up-front nature of the fee is better.
486.
by rantwasp 6y ago
the US has (or used to have) this when it comes to processing certain forms/visa applications (I129, I140). it’s called premium processing. Is this corruption?
487.
by rantwasp 6y ago
documentation is required but not sufficient. also, documentation is usually outdated really fast if the person maintaining the system leaves and/or does not care
488.
by rantwasp 6y ago
I like the author’s follow up. It provides good insight into what FI/RE can turn into and it also helps both people that are thinking of FI and both people that don’t know what is/hate the concept. There is something deep in there
489.
by rantwasp 6y ago
of course there is no click. a lot of search traffic is machines (machines don’t click) + a lot of the results come in on the SERP.
490.
by rantwasp 6y ago
nah. documentation only goes so far. you handle this by having and exercising a disaster recovery plan and having (and listening to) competent people that would spot this issue in a jiffy.
491.
by rantwasp 6y ago
./configure; make; make install on the unpacked empathy tarball you just downloaded
492.
by rantwasp 6y ago
i am not even mad. this is amazing. now i’m gonna follow the dude. deal with it :))
493.
by rantwasp 6y ago
to be fair, switching over is probably non-trivial and/or risky
494.
by rantwasp 6y ago
the reason for the dreams being "random" is that you don't have input from your sensory system (ie it's turned off and the brain is generating "synthetic" input). you can see how volatile and random out thinkin
495.
by rantwasp 6y ago
nope. puma does the right thing. this is exactly what i looked at when i saw unicorn in the article
496.
by rantwasp 6y ago
this is not Ruby. This is unicorn doing some dumb stuff
497.
by rantwasp 6y ago
hah. good luck just moving it to another stack. this just doesn’t happen. also, what does familiar to them means in the MS context? i’m sure the people that work on github are familiar with the stack
498.
by rantwasp 6y ago
food for thought: if they have used puma (which is sort of what people have been using since 2017 when it comes to ruby/rails) would this bug have still existed?
499.
by rantwasp 6y ago
i think it's pretty widely accepted that dreaming serves as a mechanism for memory consolidation (different time scales while attempting to "compress" the information to something useful) and also allows us to run simulation
500.
by rantwasp 6y ago
keep the satellite. shipping back is gonna be more than what we payed for it
501.
by rantwasp 6y ago
the real MVP... or MLVP... seeing the neural nets in XML!
502.
by rantwasp 6y ago
they’re 66% the same thing. yes /s
503.
by rantwasp 6y ago
at what point does the legend speak up?
504.
by rantwasp 6y ago
offtopic: Hey munificent! Great fan of your books. Keep up the great work!
505.
by rantwasp 6y ago
I empathize with how hard it is for a female founder in particular and for a woman in general when it comes to mixing children with a career. That said the advice to freeze your eggs (ie work now, live later) rubs me the wrong way. I wish
506.
by rantwasp 6y ago
i used to do this before the pandemic. i would have limit my screen time and it worked wonders
507.
by rantwasp 6y ago
the struggle is real. but for people that want to talk to me there is Signal. I have seen a lot of people jumping on it lately. The tide is turning
508.
by rantwasp 6y ago
I have zero sympathy for what Facebook is doing so I believe this is a step in the right direction. A bigger step would be to just stop using anything Facebook. You attention is a precious resource and your time on Earth is limited.
509.
by rantwasp 6y ago
why not both?
510.
by rantwasp 6y ago
hah. this must be some sort of joke. even to covid your immune system develops a response that is effective in most cases. from scratch. without seeing the virus before. that is bloody impressive. i’m not trying to diminish the vaccine or a

More ›