randomdudeonhn

4 ms·

1.
On Appreciation of the Web(ror6ax.wordpress.com)
1 points by randomdudeonhn 7y ago|0 comments
2.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
What makes you think so? Product may be great in it's main objective but slow as compared to what could have been, ineffective in spending computing resources, unable to scale as much as it otherwise could, insecurely handling data, et
3.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
I won't start even bigger shitstorm by naming better languages in my opinion. Suffice to say I've never had problems sending headers or getting HTTP status code in any major language, except JS(examples are linked in the post).
4.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
I've tried to explain my point and provide some examples of how the problem manifests in the ecosystem of the language. While my writing skills may need work, I would not call the post random.
5.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
Mmm, what?
6.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
> it's not the tools that matter, but what you build. Given this logic we all should be writing in Algol.
7.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
Boeing 737 MAX is fine. It has good hydraulics, state of the art breaks and a fine wing shape. It also falls from the sky but don't let the naysayers discourage you.
8.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
Some people never ask themselves "have I actually read what I am criticising?".
9.
by randomdudeonhn 7y ago
Unfortunately, I keep hearing from many developers that JS is popular and therefore cannot be "that bad". Which it is, in spades.
10.
JavaScript Is Bad(ror6ax.wordpress.com)
81 points by randomdudeonhn 7y ago|98 comments