random3

20 ms·

301.
by random3 1y ago
Shilling what? AI in general? What’s the incentive? Hype is harder to argue. LLMs are defective attempts at AI, but that’s also a huge blind spot— effectively confounding AI and AI progress with a specific instance like LLMs. Business ince
302.
by random3 1y ago
Exactly! The OP’s surprisal is surprising, given that 95% of all support interactions across the board are exactly like this. In fact, the internal support - i.e. the support for employees is just as bad and nonsensical. It goes pretty much
303.
by random3 1y ago
I can't find the resource, but, according to Bellman he needed a name that wouldn't sound like something the army would scrape— effectively protecting his research. He had a few options and "dynamic" sounded "cool&q
304.
by random3 1y ago
What are the alternatives and what makes them a better choice for consumer use-cases.
305.
by random3 1y ago
They likely outperform for the same reason they are self-thought— i.e. it's most likely a confounder. If you have enough curiosity/pull, motivation, discipline to do it, you'll outperform in general, self-thought or not. Ther
306.
by random3 1y ago
Feeling the seeming recklessness, but in the grand scheme of things, it may be worthwhile to throw AI at the problem to validate existence, solutions etc. So “spending” this now vs later is at least unclear wrt to long term outcomes.
307.
by random3 1y ago
Yeah, even crazier - some chose to be in mental institutions instead of their homes
308.
by random3 1y ago
That’s cool, but instead you’ll learn what car owners are prone to respond to this type of question, not exactly what your question is aiming at.
309.
by random3 1y ago
Same thing - I've been adjusting my sleep since first Sleep Cycle came for iPhone. I started with a "smart" alarm and learned alarms are harmful. I didn't need an alarm, I just needed 7-8h of sleep. I was going to bed 1-
310.
by random3 1y ago
No, the discreetness comes from physical experiments. I do see a problem defining something outside of one’s mind or outside the universe though :)
311.
by random3 1y ago
Can you explain what you mean here? I mean yes there’s a universe so it can be see as a unit. There’s also quantum mechanics, telling us we can only distinguish discrete objects at the bottom of the scale. Can you give an example of a non-h
312.
by random3 1y ago
Maybe there's a secret guide on how to build up karma :))
313.
by random3 1y ago
Heres a title “some LLMs can detect to some degree some evaluation scenarios” is this catchy? There are likely 50 papers on the topic. This one made it to the top of HN. Why? Did it have a good review? No, it had a catchy title. Is it good
314.
by random3 1y ago
I see. Thanks for clarifying. I did want to argue about how it was phrased and what is alluding to. Implying increased risk from "knowing" the eval regime is roughly as weak as the definition of "knowing". It can be eq
315.
by random3 1y ago
I resonate with this vibe
316.
by random3 1y ago
I suspect that in the near future nobody will directly read product recommendations.
317.
by random3 1y ago
colloquial use of "know" implies anthropomorphisation. Arguing that usign "knowing" in the title and "awarness" and "superhuman" in the abstract is just colloquial for "matching" is splittin
318.
by random3 1y ago
and s/superhuman//
319.
by random3 1y ago
"Knowing" needs not exist outside of human invention. In fact that's the point - it only matters in relation to humans. You can choose whatever definition you want, but the reality is that, once you chose a non-standard defin
320.
by random3 1y ago
If a popularity is the measure of success, then ZFC is successful. However, I'm not sure there's anything that requires it and doubt that there's a strong claim wrt to any ZFC requirement. So saying science requires it, is
321.
by random3 1y ago
Just like they "know" English. "know" is quite an anthropomorphization. As long as an LLM will be able to describe what an evaluation is (why wouldn't it?) there's a reasonable expectation to distinguish/r
322.
by random3 1y ago
memristors are back
323.
by random3 1y ago
Isn’t a caloric deficit implicitly fasting though? Guessing there’s number of calories / time formula there.
324.
by random3 1y ago
why salty water? does milk/cream in coffee make it not fasting?
325.
by random3 1y ago
Yes, but at a physical level, so it needs different hardware. Delete (e.g. AND) generates heat, so you need different gates, like the Fredkin gate.
326.
by random3 1y ago
And the even more general advice: "First, break all the rules" (not (necessarily) the book).
327.
by random3 1y ago
It’s an opinion - he/she is the source
328.
by random3 1y ago
Try Obsidian, you'll like it. The Markdown editing experience is great and it's overall a good product.
329.
by random3 1y ago
I wanted Zed to work as a high performance dev-enabled Markdown editor as I was looking to replace Obsidian that doesn't scale well (memory use and cursor latency degrades with document size, and generally what I suspect is a weak foun
330.
by random3 1y ago
Seeing some good comments and will add to the pile. IMO it's not a "now" thing. There's a natural ad-hoc, close proximity vibe that some gatherings have. They often come with everything else, including flow and good (bes

More ›