Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rando3826
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rando3826
11y ago
I clicked the link and then my browser (firefox) froze. Thanks.
32.
▲
by
rando3826
11y ago
And so I will continue to avoid C++ because I'm not a master and will not avoid the many pitfals, and I want to get things done, not become a master of C++.
33.
▲
by
rando3826
11y ago
The answer to both questions is yes. The talent pool and cost of developer talent is significantly impacted by a company's reputation, including it's activities in the free/open source arena. Also, your question include a fal
34.
▲
by
rando3826
11y ago
> if you come to me and say 'our art pipeline sucks, it's too inefficient' and then walk away, I literally have nothing at all to work on. The 'art pipeline' might be something you could work on...
35.
▲
by
rando3826
11y ago
Agree. Would love to hear from someone who uses this while working at their computer, and someone who uses it for viewing media on the tv.
36.
▲
by
rando3826
11y ago
There is nothing more costly about providing open internet than closed internet. If you only look at certain domains, those domains will subsidize the price. It's pushing two things unnecarily into one. It's like, if you can pay f
37.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Lol, took me a minute to get the sarcasm.
38.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Meh, your both wrong. When appropriate, doctors do ask about diet, they do recommend changes to diet, it does make a difference, and being healthy is not necessarily simple.
39.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
The first link describes it as "D news aggregator, newsgroup client, web newsreader and IRC bot." I don't see anything about mailing list. And at first, I thought the D part meant that was customized to be just for the D proj
40.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Agree, except that the underpinning is about about the freedom to improve and share, which generally means there's a freely available version on the internet, but by no means means you can't or shouldn't buy electronic or pap
41.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Great. The thing I like is that you get maximum flexibility, and good web interface. For example: I run a mail server which handles mail for some subdomains, and the root domain mail I route through them. Every time I give an email out to a
42.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
I highly doubt it. And I doubt they will patch it.
43.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
But it's impossible. If I'm logging your keystrokes, game over. Unless you add some firmware to do dsa encryption in your brain, and become very fast at typing cyphertext.
44.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Proper HTTPS is secure at MITM attacks. HTTPS can be MITMed if the certs or local systems have been breached. But the MITM is just a byproduct of a different failure. Absolutely any secure communication protocol has to be honored by both pa
45.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
> he found himself unable to adapt a new Xerox printer with a program he’d created to alert users to paper jams And still I can't go to an average computer store, buy a printer which is powered by free software so I could customize
46.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
> still have a 1/2 chance of winning by switching It seems that you are referring to the other variant, in which case this is false, because that one has a 2/3 chance of winning by switching.
47.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Welcome to the world of patents.
48.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Hi, I see you'd like to start a quest into the dark heart of our corporate bureaucracy to join the other .0001% of customers who aren't having their privacy violated. We respect you. We love you (feel free to share that via social
49.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Fuck you (I'm extraordinary)
50.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
What are C=D years?
51.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Not at all obvious to the investors who value these companies at tens and hundreds of billions of dollars. They don't expect them to dissapear in 5-10 years
52.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Your reply was in reference to the future, so it's logical for a reader to assume that's what you were talking about. > If specialized apps start to show up, people may start ditching FB altogether.
53.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
> we wouldn't dream of not being on FB And 10 years ago I wouldn't dream of not having my ICQ friends. Your dreams are not the /most/ relevant.
54.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
Yes, I will blame them. You make no compelling case otherwise. This is how the internet works. If you run a server with security vunls that are well known and patches available: it gets owned. It's your fault. Same type of situation he
55.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
This. Seriously: a company makes a product which has the ability to be broken by hackers using a method (ddos), which is widely known and extensively used for over 20 years. And the product is closed source so no one can fix it. So... hacke
56.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
First off, that's not what he said. Secondly, lots of smart people have been talking about the need for basic income when robots take over large portions of the labor force. I'm personally unconvinced that it will create mass unem
57.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
> Silly Valley Fair enough. I suppose that term will stay in my head now.
58.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
I'm sceptical that the person hacking your console lived in the same apartment complex.
59.
▲
by
rando3826
12y ago
> wouldn't they also greatly reduce the inventor's chances of ever making any money with their patent? Maybe, maybe not. If the inventor wants to make money by implementing their invention, and also benefit from the ideas other