rana1-31

83 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   What is a use case for an interpreted runtime language?
2. 2.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   How is Deno more efficient?
3. 3.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   I have done work on compiler, developer tooling and a lot of other stuff people would consider 'compilated' and working on those was far less complex than some business logic in API's I have had to work upon. So if the experi
4. 4.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   My point was not the compilers/interpreters, it was the fact ALL the tooling is NOT in Deno.
5. 5.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   I think you nailed it! If Deno wouldn't use itself because of reasons like this; then people should really think twice before using it to build anything server side.
6. 6.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   Other than browser based applications why would you choose JavaScript/TypeScript etc over Rust? Developer tooling is not complicated and there is plenty of existing tools written in JavaScript, so it seems weird when they rule out ther
7. 7.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   You are going to have to reword this, it makes no sense to me.
8. 8.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   But not just the runtime, all the tooling including linters and document generators etc why are they not written using Deno then?
9. 9.▲
   by rana1-31 5y ago

   So the Deno runtime is written in Rust and so is all the Deno tooling... So why would you use Deno if it is not good enough for itself?