ramriot

3 ms·

1.
by ramriot 9y ago
Nice summary, a couple of minor corrections. * SQRL is not a 2FA, it's a better 1st factor
2.
by ramriot 9y ago
You may think that, but does not appear to be so. The response is a 302/3 redirect which automatically puts it outside the bailiwick of the attackers scope. Provided that is the attacker is not using same domain origin, scheme, port et
3.
by ramriot 9y ago
Very simply: In the browser session authentication use case, as well as a sqrl:// scheme link being launched the browser makes a parallel internal probe and then direct GET request to http://127.0.0.1 on port 25519 whi
4.
by ramriot 9y ago
Which would make it no worse in that respect than anything else & in many respects much better, please Note: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14472929 The use of remote QR-Code authentication is no longer a key feat
5.
by ramriot 9y ago
Very much comment here on this subject, unfortunately very much of it references out of date or incorrect sources or even misses the point entirely possibly due to the posters not understanding the underlying concepts. I partly blame myself
6.
by ramriot 12y ago
Haters need to look closely at the add again. The bottles are not "opened" by the action of placing two caps together and twisting. What appears to happen is that a spinning cap placed over the normal cap can be forced to jam agai
7.
by ramriot 12y ago
Sorry, no crypto description up front, no open protocol, therefore no bite.
8.
by ramriot 12y ago
Although the primes are included in the patent, are they the subject of the patent? Follow the logic here:- If NO: Then they themselves are not patented but the "Partial modular reduction method" is. If YES: Then these specific pr