ramraj07

21 ms·

481.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Probably a physics PhD data scientist :)
482.
by ramraj07 3y ago
This is like Walter in the Big Lebowski bringing up Nam.
483.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Are they floating? If not are they the same?
484.
by ramraj07 3y ago
It is literally the same but a more refined term. Just like calling something distended instead of fat.
485.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Continuing the idea that life might be in a completely unrecognizable form, how are we even supposed to study and discover it?
486.
by ramraj07 3y ago
I’m getting annoyed at the disingenuous researchers and reporters who keep repeating it. A cursory look into any red dwarf based system will immediately show how unlikely it is you will find complex life in them for two reasons: 1. The plan
487.
by ramraj07 3y ago
It’s a fun project but the microscope is not the bottleneck in any place where you can do a research experiment.
488.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Damn near every university microscope facility has a spinning disk confocal microscope that costs as much so yeah if it only costs half a mill instead of 10x itll be more widely available.
489.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Sure but that just doesnt gel with also getting burned out.
490.
by ramraj07 3y ago
A comparison would be to a kitchenaid stand mixer. Once you’ve perfected a gadget best to stop there and not try and add useless value.
491.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Formatting wise this is a very poorly made figure. I sincerely hope this is not the current standards for what’s considered to be a good journal nowadays.
492.
by ramraj07 3y ago
If you’re a gadget head I’d implore you try and establish a good eBay routine. I find it cathartic to sell my old gadgets there. It’s not just that there’s money to be made but it’s guaranteed that someone gets a use out of your beloved gad
493.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Every Tom Dick and Harry has done that course and the collective inability of most to still understand ML suggests that the course isn’t great after all.
494.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Maybe you should sell it then? Given its scarce and all..
495.
by ramraj07 3y ago
They did have one incident though - https://www.thedailybeast.com/google-engineer-stalked-spied-...
496.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Nytimes mentioned that just a month back someone else was promoted to the same level as Ilya. Sounds like more than a coincidence.
497.
by ramraj07 3y ago
I can't imagine a single person I've met in my life who would be as Zen as this bloke was as a kid. One wonders what engenders such quality in a person.
498.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Is there anything in quantum fields that directly demand them to not be Lorentz invariant? I feel like these are independent hypotheses..
499.
by ramraj07 3y ago
We looked for Gravitational lensing only after Einstein proposed his theory and wanted validation. No one wanted to actually put the effort to do the measurement during an eclipse and iirc Einstein had to lobby for it greatly and only a sin
500.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Ive gone through the thread and dont see what supports your argument. The top comment quotes Einstein himself, but here’s his own final statement from that quote: > The new feature of it was the realization of the fact that the bearing o
501.
by ramraj07 3y ago
The great insight IMO was special theory; the General Theory was I suppose a bit more obvious generalization that just needed the math to be figured out..
502.
by ramraj07 3y ago
The Walter Issacson biography quoted Kip Thorne as saying if Einstein didn’t come up with relativity, likely no one would have for 30-40 years after. Which is insane and totally sensible. This theory had nothing to do with any observation o
503.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Not that I’m agreeing with whatever was mentioned in the original comment, but as a semi outsider I feel we are indeed being disingenuous about this - what are quantum fields if not ether? I see no difference philosophically. Like the funda
504.
by ramraj07 3y ago
What exactly isn’t right about “theory of relativity”? Like the general theory?
505.
by ramraj07 3y ago
That’s just mere fashion. My dad once was good friends with the then president of India. Didn’t mean nothing to any effort or initiative he wanted. It’s not knowing or sitting with someone that matters, it was leverage. Doubt Sam had that o
506.
by ramraj07 3y ago
Further wouldn’t they not be able to create GPT-x exactly as it was even though they know it?
507.
by ramraj07 3y ago
That would go as well as trying to write a universal android iOS app or write ansi sql to work across database platforms. A bad idea in every dimension.
508.
by ramraj07 3y ago
How exactly will he make loads of money if he didn’t have any equity in OpenAI? Or should we assume that was a lie?
509.
by ramraj07 3y ago
It’s so juicy statements like this become stale in hours. Exciting times.
510.
by ramraj07 3y ago
There’s always a hoarde of people second guessing the 10x engineer. Of course it looks impossible to regular folks. I have seen a few people like this. They’re real. Sometimes it’s even worth the dysfunction they cause to see this in action

More ›