ramesh31

22 ms·

391.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>No build process, no web-packer, no framework, no npm requirement. Just include the JS in your HTML and then you can create and include components. How does the rest of your codebase look? This is the primary problem with web components
392.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Instead of asking how can we ship more code or how can we ship better code, why not "how can AI give me a better life"? Machines are supposed to make our lives easier. If I can output the same quality at a faster rate of speed, wh
393.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Anthropic down/degraded as well. Time to go for a walk.
394.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Anthropic will need to follow suit with Opus soon. It is simply too expensive for anything by an order of magnitude.
395.
by ramesh31 1y ago
The hard truth here is in accepting that the 20 lines in your head were probably wrong, or suboptimal, and letting go of that urge. Think in interfaces, not implementations. Successive rendering, not one-shot.
396.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>LLM agents make bad pairs because they code faster than humans think This is why I strongly dislike all of the terminal based tools and PR based stuff. If you're left to read through a completed chunk of code it is just overwhelmin
397.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Agents are the orchestration layer, i.e. a perfect fit for Go (or Erlang, or Node). You don't need a "mountain of AI-related libraries" for them, particularly given the fact that what we call an agent now has only existed for
398.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>If you would give a human the SVG documentation and ask to write an SVG, I think the results would be quite similar. It certainly would, and it would cost at minimum an hour of the human programmer's time at $50+/hr. Claude do
399.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Single shot?
400.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Flash is just so obscenely cheap at this point it's hard to justify the headache of self hosting though. Really only applies to sensitive data IMO.
401.
by ramesh31 1y ago
This in relation, of course, to the US/UK, where it has reached comical levels.
402.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>The freedom to waste time. The freedom to waste resources. And the autonomy to decide how. I think we massively underestimate just how much one simple fact, the absurd explosion of housing costs, have contributed to this. Take that away
403.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Human in the loop means despite your best efforts at initial prompting (which is what rules are), there will always be the need to say "no, that's wrong, now do this instead". Expecting to be able to write enough rules for th
404.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Just looked up tickets on the Coast Starlight, Emeryville to LA is a $790 round trip in a standard bedroom. Assuming a "luxury" train service is at least double that, you could hire a private driver for less than this and be there
405.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>If you are answering these questions yourself, why not just add something like this to your cursor rules? What you are asking for is AGI. We still need human in the loop for now.
406.
by ramesh31 1y ago
> it is easy to imagine a situation where specifying too many tools (or MCPs) can overwhelm it, affecting the accuracy. Answer to this is agent explorable interfaces a la HATEOAS. Define a single entry point to your MCP gateway and give
407.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Cline all the way: https://cline.bot/ . Haven't found anything else that even comes close.
408.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Nobody is actually using Windsurf. It was an acquihire and a squashing of competition that caught ground in the enterprise contract market really early. Anyone doing agentic coding seriously is using open source tooling with direct token pr
409.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Tools are the only thing that matters, and are what you should focus on, not "agents" as a separate concept. Locking yourself into any particular agent framework is silly; they are nothing but LLM calling while-loops connected to
410.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>After those, his own movies have almost become caricatures of an Anderson film and the characters have become so much like clockwork that they might as well be set pieces themselves. I think this is a feature of his artistic refinement
411.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>I recently heard someone say "I've never had a job that didn't involve at least some Python". Tell me you've been in the field for less than 10 years without telling me. Python is a joke language with a joke nam
412.
by ramesh31 1y ago
Thank you for saying this because it feels like these people entering the industry in such numbers over the 2010s completely killed what made this job fun in the first place. I call them "ticket completers". Sure they can mechanic
413.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>But I do think the cinematic world as a whole would benefit from him experimenting a little more, trying a novel format, and so on. But his format is novel in the entire world of cinema right now, even if it doesn't change from f
414.
by ramesh31 1y ago
There's an amazing Trekkie documentary from the 90s on YouTube that goes into this: https://youtu.be/fXWXvIB9NYs?t=522
415.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>"Speaking of AI, is it any use? Well, somewhat. It writes half-useful CSS. It saves time on some things (but also makes bizarre choices on other things -- whatevs). I basically paired with it occasionally. It was OK." Tailwind
416.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>Without well paid middle classes, who is buying all the fancy goods and services? Rich people buying even fancier goods and services. You already see this in the auto industry. Why build a great $20,000 car for the masses when you can m
417.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>The prevailing counter-narrative is that AI is going to flop. HARD. You can't get more diametrically opposed than that. The answer (as always) lies somewhere in the middle. Expert software developers who embrace the tech whole hear
418.
by ramesh31 1y ago
You can see the effect in these images directly without a device, by simply crossing your eyes and focusing on the third central image that appears, similar to those 3D optical illusion books: https://youtu.be/zBa-bCxsZDk
419.
by ramesh31 1y ago
I've always thought that caring is the most precious resource in software development. You can pay people to show up to an office, you can pay people to write code, but you simply cannot pay people to care. It takes some special conflu
420.
by ramesh31 1y ago
>My workflow involves manual copying and pasting from the browser into my own text editor. Cline with mcp-playwright: https://github.com/executeautomation/mcp-playwright There is no free tier like other tools, but i

More ›