ramblerman

5 ms·

31.
by ramblerman 9mo ago
for what it's worth, it didn't seem odd to me. I guess the missing article and phrase indicate it's a verb. "So AI can ... developers" is begging for a verb, there is no room for an adjective there.
32.
by ramblerman 9mo ago
I disliked the pedantic nature of stackoverflow like the next guy but this seems like a naive take. SO solved a problem, that problem is now gone
33.
by ramblerman 9mo ago
It's almost as if it depends on the context and there isn't a simplistic bumper sticker approach.
34.
by ramblerman 9mo ago
> Maybe Carnegie’s relatives decided the book could appeal to a 2x audience? So if a book uses male examples it only appeals to males, but if it uses female examples it appeals to both males and females?
35.
by ramblerman 10mo ago
> Some days I just can’t get over how we’re just the dumbest ##^*ing species to ever visit space I also think we are pretty dumb. But what reference point makes you think we are either smarter or dumber than other spacefaring species
36.
by ramblerman 10mo ago
Sorry but as a southern Neighbor you are painting a picture of Europe 20 years ago. Taxes these days keep up the ponzi scheme of european pensions and an influx of low skilled migrants that are not incentivized to work. There is a a lot of
37.
by ramblerman 11mo ago
OP's point (imo valid) relates to the private sphere, and how we as normal humans are more afraid of outing our sexual fears/desires because of the possibility of them being amplified on the internet. And you somehow think that mi
38.
by ramblerman 11mo ago
He didn't even realize (and apparently doesn't care) that portions of the code were attributed to another author. > Here's my question: why did the files that you submitted name Mark Shinwell as the author? > Beats me.
39.
by ramblerman 11mo ago
Likely. But the fact the last few iterations have all been about flair, it seems we are witnessing the regression of OpenAI into the typical fiefdom of product owners. Which might indicate they are out of options on pushing LLMs beyond thei
40.
by ramblerman 11mo ago
This new package is about "removing regulation", specifically GDPR. Which let's be honest has not achieved its intended target. Google/Apple/etc can easily afford to break GDPR and get caught up in fines while as a
41.
by ramblerman 1y ago
It seems OP did it in ketosis, and then slowly experimented with adding healthy carbs back in limited amounts. Unless otherwise mentioned, I assume your friend added a bunch of eggs to his existing diet, which is comparing apples and orange
42.
by ramblerman 1y ago
> you don't mean that all C programs have memory bugs Well all of them "potentially" do, which is enough from a security standpoint There have been enough zero days using memory leaks that we know the percentage is also no
43.
by ramblerman 1y ago
I was questioning if OP was a karma farming bot, have a look at their profile. It's a lot of these odd one liner questions. From the perspective of a useful thread, I agree with you
44.
by ramblerman 1y ago
I truly don't understand this on a tech forum. You have 6000 karma, is this a bot interaction to promote votes? How does searching "Helsinki MOOC java" not immediately give you the result you are after?
45.
by ramblerman 1y ago
less and less, with the new release cycles. What you get is either really old (Java 8 stuck on something nasty like weblogic). Or companies running either cutting edge or LTS.
46.
by ramblerman 1y ago
You seem to be saying that SAP sucks because of how enterprise java is. That would make OPs counter re netflix relevant. I don't understand your point
47.
by ramblerman 1y ago
Is there a reason to believe this would skew results? i.e. Are you assuming (insinuating) jobs for some programming languages are more likely to be fake
48.
by ramblerman 1y ago
The whole point of omarchy is to give you great defaults, and then it being linux everything is completely customizable. Which with ChatGpt/Grok is trivial these days for even a non linux native.
49.
by ramblerman 1y ago
Did you read the article? OP doesn't care about bots figuring it out. It's about the compute needed to do the work. It's quite an interesting piece, I feel like you projected something completely different onto it. Your point
50.
by ramblerman 1y ago
I am originally from Europe as well. And still living there (not sure if that’s why you phrased it like that) but how many innovations from the us are really adding to the value of life vs just forcing eyeballs to screen. Linux came from Eu
51.
by ramblerman 1y ago
@dang why is this flagged? Simonw is a long term member with a good track record, good faith posts. And this post in particular is pretty incredible. The notion that Grok literally searches for "from: musk" to align itself with hi
52.
by ramblerman 1y ago
Love the concept but “the moat of low status” is a poor name. It implies a defensive structure. I.e the advantage I get out of low status. Op even refers to the concept of moats as used in business, but clumsily hand waves the concept to fi
53.
by ramblerman 1y ago
you talk as if people have never overcome addiction with sheer willpower.
54.
by ramblerman 1y ago
Vonnegut sounds closer to an epicurist. A nihilist would say fart or don't fart it's all pointless.
55.
by ramblerman 1y ago
The difference is that the jury is still out if these things are truly generating something novel. Or are we just making it pick from the spaces in between an average of all the images on the internet. The latter would mean everything quick
56.
by ramblerman 1y ago
You don’t need to feel offended on behalf of LLMs, they are tremendously useful. But not above criticism. There is a belief being peddled that AGI is right around the corner and we can get there by just scaling up LLMs. Papers like this are
57.
by ramblerman 1y ago
I think this is about trademark not IP
58.
by ramblerman 1y ago
What do you genuinely think they built upon from your paper? If anything, the presentation of their results in such an accessible format next to the paper should be commended.
59.
by ramblerman 1y ago
one got it from smoking, and the other 2 got it from not smoking
60.
by ramblerman 1y ago
Can't tell from ur comment, but for the people that didn't read the article this is comparing people born in ~1890 to those born in ~1940

More ›