Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ram1024
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
31.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
i see dead people
32.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
well get down witcho bad self then
33.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
on a serious note, chrome is a very ambitious project, not just a browser. people should look into it and gears before making any judgements about what it will or will not "kill".
34.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
i wouldn't say chrome will just kill firefox, but they might probably severely injure them. chrome will injure everyone, however. chrome is god, all hail...
35.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
it just seems to me that he's trying to re-evolution something that has already evolved. i'm just saying, evolving further is more attractive than declaring this lineage a failure and going back to knuckledragging. it feels like when these
36.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
uhm. is he saying he wants to buy a car that's surprisingly innovative with its heated wing mirrors but lacks another company's life saving side collision impact distribution lattice? these 1000 car companies all made innovations that COLL
37.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
are they saying google is a perfect product such that innovation and progress are no longer necessary? google obviously doesn't want to get leapfrogged in "technology" in the one area that is its proven moneymaker. it's going to continue t
38.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
makes me want to take over yahoo and make it successful. stick it to ol ballmer the spaz... wouldn't be hard
39.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
i love the way you speak, baby
40.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
ehh. you think people are going to waste effort and verify everyone's app for FREE? there has to be some kind of lockout involved or every piece of crap will have to be picked apart. this is assuming they actually run checks to make sure t
41.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
we've just now started created nanotechnological materials. it will be a significant amount of time before we can actually engineer with structures this size. also keep in mind a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, that means thi
42.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
space elevators are at least 50 years away... we haven't even been back to the moon yet. let's be realistic
43.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
i think you need silence for concentration and music for creativity. so it would really depend on the situation i think. probably varies depending on the person as well.
44.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
it's a service. it either has to be paid for, or it has to generate revenue through other channels (read: selling ads). as it stands now with it being free, it has no obligation to cater to its community in any way. i say, don't look a gi
45.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
isn't the first rule of HN: "No Drama" ? you'd certainly get a better response about aliens if you posted it on a niche site dedicated to discussing that topic. i don't go to KFC and order whoppers
46.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
Yes! EVERYONE calls me an idiot, he gets no special privileges with his generic attacks
47.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
i disagree. there will always be advertising on any consumable medium, internet or otherwise. unless he's saying viewer eyeballs are worth ABSOLUTELY NOTHING, there will always be people willing to pay for that exposure. it's never going a
48.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
yeh, "the orbiter has to come back around to this side of the moon before we can get a transmission of the recorded event" was the answer i got in my research of it. pfah, a likely excuse... :D
49.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
it's easy to make enough to keep it sustained a bit harder to make money off it and almost impossible to make the kind of money they are EXPECTING to make off it (see company valuation) it was overhyped and now it will struggle to meet the
50.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
screenshot or it didn't happen
51.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
promoting monogamy and faithfulness? one needs a legal binding contract for these things? i mean seriously. this is adult stuff, if "the law" is the only thing preventing you from sleeping around, then you aren't mature enough to be in the
52.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
people should have every right in the world to define their relationship to each other in any manner they like. the law should simply allow simplification of contract terms should they be required (custody, assets, etc). the idea that "marr
53.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
sounds to me like success of a four hour work week relies on writing a book called "four hour work week" and getting people to buy it... but seriously, anything truly profitable that can be handled in 4 hours a week is already being done by
54.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
i'm so confused after reading that. i don't even take my real life as seriously as they take their virtual lives...
55.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
what needs to be created is a bit-torrent type affair for people to consume video over the internet, such that users logged into a network (let's say youtube) download and also share the videos they consume. this will reduce the overall ban
56.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
seems VCs were riding a bubble of their own and forgot that funding poor ideas loses money. were good ideas ever in such short supply that funding bad ones was NECESSARY? you know what might be a good idea? putting together a crack team of
57.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
unless all your friends have significant "reputation" they wouldn't be able to impact the system. we wouldn't be giving complete noob accounts the same voting power as vetted community participants. voting ranking wouldn't be anonymous eith
58.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
open funding prospects to popular vote. people will choose who they think are the most suitable to receive funding. by making it competitive, and relevant to the consumers of the products, we inject realism to ventures. we will no longer
59.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
i think it's an interesting idea. basically a public forum where everyone sees the messages and rates them. you should build this, i think if someone "famous" got enough feedback/requests/traffic in "their" inbox they might bother looking
60.
▲
by
ram1024
18y ago
a fascinating thought experiment indeed. although the way i see it, the chess example is more in-line with the google-ing of answers instead of "intelligently" finding a solution. intelligence itself comes from wealth of experience, subtle
More ›