3 ms·
uhm. is he saying he wants to buy a car that's surprisingly innovative with its heated wing mirrors but lacks another company's life saving side collision impa
by ram1024 18y ago
uhm. is he saying he wants to buy a car that's surprisingly innovative with its heated wing mirrors but lacks another company's life saving side collision impact distribution lattice?
these 1000 car companies all made innovations that COLLECTIVELY would make 1 decent car. why the hell would you want to buy a car with 1 or 2 of these critical features? eventually as a market settles, desirable features are consolidated, it's the reason why we don't have 1000 companies making PC operating systems and browsers...
- jaf656s 18y agoYou might not, but maybe some people would. That's where innovation comes in: finding a mix of features so people choose what is important to them at different price points. What doesn't work doesn't sell, and then back to the drawing board. Many people drive motorcycles, after all. What would be interesting would be if alt-energy cars were classified as a different type of motor vehicle, with a relaxed set of regulations. This would allow for new companies to make them, and for established companies to make them cheaper. Then after the market is established, and many companies have innovated in the industry, then slowly ratchet up the regulations on them. Just a thought.
- ram1024 18y agoit just seems to me that he's trying to re-evolution something that has already evolved. i'm just saying, evolving further is more attractive than declaring this lineage a failure and going back to knuckledragging. it feels like when these a-hole anarchists think society would be better off if everyone had to defend their property with shotguns instead of having the system of law enforcement and crime-science we have now.