rakoo

17 ms·

241.
by rakoo 3y ago
No indeed, democracy is the group collectively deciding about their conditions. A democracy doesn't necessarily implies elections and officians, that's only one form. The whole point of a democracy is that people are the priority,
242.
by rakoo 3y ago
The atomic family of 2 adults and children is a very recent invention. The historical family is a bunch of people living under the same roof, working and doing for the whole family, from each according to their ability, for each according t
243.
by rakoo 3y ago
> Your corporate job isn't a democracy. Herein lies the crux. We want to live in a democracy, but fundamentally undemocratic entities run the world and act on it in ways none of the citizens decided. The obvious next step is to dism
244.
by rakoo 3y ago
What security would be interesting here ?
245.
by rakoo 3y ago
torrents are file-based but in v1 the edge of a file doesn't map with the edge of a piece, so you can't easily find file's hashes. In v2 this is solved and it is possible to easily know the hash of each file in the torrent, s
246.
by rakoo 3y ago
You have all the hashes in the .torrent file. All you need is a regular check with it (but then the .torrent file itself has to be stored on a storage that resists bit flipping)
247.
by rakoo 3y ago
Yes, and that is where self-controlled tools change things. Instead of hoping some third-party for-profit tool who continouously demonstrated they will not take care of oppressed populations, we have the possibility to make what we want,
248.
by rakoo 3y ago
You're assuming that all interactions are equal and calm and it takes little time to organize your comms; It's wrong. If I am a trans person, my content will be shared with a company that has demonstrated it doesn't care abou
249.
by rakoo 3y ago
If I learn through the press that Adobe is willing to pay amount A and this information is very peblic, I can at the very least assume they are making 10x more so I'm willing to sell it 20x more and see where this goes
250.
by rakoo 3y ago
Yes, but that's not a protocol. That's uploading a key to a server. The protocol is WKD and Proton doesn't respect it. Me opening an account on GMail doesn't mean I want people to contact me on GMail. If our protocol, ie
251.
by rakoo 3y ago
Yes, KOO is a good intermediary, but it still matters: there are no agreed-upon mechanism saying it should be used in all cases. You took this liberty. Why not even ask the receivers, aka those who know, if they're ok using that key ?
252.
by rakoo 3y ago
No, the opt-in is by actually following the spec, not uploading to a random server op has 0 control over.
253.
by rakoo 3y ago
That a key exist on a random keyserver means nothing. There is a spec that explicitely says "if you want to use my key here it is" and Proton doesn't respect it. what does it mean that you found the key on some third-party do
254.
by rakoo 3y ago
Why does proton look up keys.openpgp.org? Is keys.openpgp.org assumed to be The One Directory for everyone ? Who said so ? There is no reason to consider it as the centre of the world if you deon't use it. That's exactly what wkd
255.
by rakoo 3y ago
So if I understand correctly: - Proton uses WKD for keys outside its own domain - OP didn't activate WKD for their own key (there is no CNAME) - But Proton still assumed that it was activated, that their key was on keys.openpgp.org
256.
by rakoo 3y ago
> In anarchy, the strong will subjugate the weak, and thus only the strong are free. Th'at's not anarchy, that's libertarianism: maximal individual freedom at the expense of others. Coincidentally the system propelled by
257.
by rakoo 3y ago
https://codeberg.org/redict/redict
258.
by rakoo 3y ago
I suppose by three you mean 10 million
259.
by rakoo 3y ago
Not the original poster, but Cinny is better than Element
260.
by rakoo 3y ago
Poor little things that do not want to share anything want to work as little as possible. If only we could collectively diminish our commons to make life easier for companies.
261.
by rakoo 3y ago
This is extortion if you want to not share back. For Libre software maximalists, this is a good thing: considering you can't do anything without others, it is only normal that you share what you do with others.
262.
by rakoo 3y ago
TL;DR: Companies complaining they can't take someone else's code, exploit it, and not share anything back.
263.
by rakoo 3y ago
And why do you need to track people ? Why is there no stable/reliable government ? Is this helping ?
264.
by rakoo 3y ago
Good, then you have a group of people being able to have this service thanks to you ! That's the goal, and already much more than what many of us here are doing.
265.
by rakoo 3y ago
Allow me to quote the message again: > If you can't/don't want to be there 24/7, let the group know that it might break but maybe the group will decide that it's fine enough. You don't owe anyone anything, a
266.
by rakoo 3y ago
> I cannot imagine my mom going through anything like this, That's why we have to post individualistically and learn that everything is social, that solutions are societal. Your mom might never be able to self-host, and you might ne
267.
by rakoo 3y ago
> The Second Life servers ignore the serial number the client sends back as a check. Some supposedly compatible servers from Open Simulator skip sequential numbers. I mean, if you're not respecting long polling, of course long polli
268.
by rakoo 3y ago
CRDTs make sure there is only one version, but that version might be garbage. Think taking all the lines from all conflicts in git. Sometimes it's ok, sometimes not. It's even worse than that: you don't know there was a confl
269.
by rakoo 3y ago
> Why is this something Amazon has not fixed? From the outside really seems like they could slap some B-trees on the individual buckets and call it a day. They fixed it already, it's called DynamoDB. With some SQS and Lambda glue yo
270.
by rakoo 3y ago
Thanks for providing your pov, it explains a lot of things and even though I have my views I can totally understand why we disagree: > Jewish immigration to the region was legal This is the crux of where we disagree. It was legal based o

More ›