raiso-lo

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by raiso-lo 10y ago

   @mc42 They use a common layer called "VCS server". Here's how it looks like from the system architecture standpoint: https://docs.rhodecode.com/RhodeCode-Enterprise/admin/system...
2. 2.▲
   by raiso-lo 10y ago

   We've been using https://rhodecode.com for internal repositories: it is also open source, yet has better interface and out-of-the-box LFS support.
3. 3.▲
   by raiso-lo 10y ago

   We ended up with RhodeCode for internal repositories. It is open source as well, but in our case, security (we're a hedge fund) is critical. None of the other platforms were able to correspond to our needs. Besides, RhodeCode has a ni
4. 4.▲
   by raiso-lo 10y ago

   RhodeCode launched the developer program for the open source contributors of it's RhodeCode CE (Community Edition, AGPLv3). They even have "badges of power" (developers who contribute code get rights to moderate discussions o
5. 5.▲
   RhodeCode Launched the Developer Program for Open Source Contributors(rhodecode.com)

   7 points by raiso-lo 10y ago|1 comments
6. 6.▲
   by raiso-lo 10y ago

   Agree, Mercurial definitely lacks a self-hosting platform. Not quite sure about _truly Open Source_ though: AGPLv3 is also Open Source ( http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.en.html ). Regardless of the license compatibi