ragingregard

5 ms·

1.
by ragingregard 9mo ago
It's sad to see how much of an echo chamber hackernews has become, used to see a a decent number of users engage in critical discussion and exchange perspective, now threads like this are just a gong show of self-reinforcement. To give
2.
by ragingregard 10mo ago
> Counting on 10% returns long term is way to aggressive especially when you have to consider sequence of returns risks during withdrawals Yes though the propose is not to retire. There's better things to do with your life (IMO) th
3.
by ragingregard 10mo ago
> You can straw man all you like No one is misrepresenting your argument, it's well understood and being argued that it is false. > students intellectual development is going to be impaired by AI because they can't be truste
4.
by ragingregard 10mo ago
That's not the core premise of this article, go read the article to the end and don't use your LLM to summarize it. The core premise is cognitive development of students is being impaired with long term implications for society wi
5.
by ragingregard 10mo ago
> This is such a naive, simplistic, distrusting and ultimately monastic perspective This is such a disingenuous take on the article, there's nothing naive or simplistic about it, it's literally full of critical thought linking
6.
by ragingregard 10mo ago
Really appreciate your comment, literally the only comment in this long sub-thread that picked up on the nonsensical numbers fooker put out. Realistically fooker's investment strategy into NDXT of 100k over 10 years would have produced
7.
by ragingregard 11mo ago
Says the user who didn't even read the article. The whole first half had nothing to do with the author's values. It was about the poor implementation of AI algorithms as it relates to creator functionality. Shitty AI creator wo
8.
by ragingregard 11mo ago
The above article is not convincing at all. Nothing on infra costs, hardware throughput + capacity (accounting for hidden tokens) & depreciation, just a blind faith that pricing by providers "covers all costs and more". Naive
9.
by ragingregard 1y ago
"Fuel efficiency on an ICE can drop up to 30% after 10 years" Complete nonsense. Every 15+ year old ICE car I've known or owned was within 5% to 10% of original fuel economy, the reliable brands actually maintained their ori
10.
by ragingregard 1y ago
"The average ICE car does not survive to 200,000 miles" That's a fair amount of misinformation in your post. 1) Any reliable ICE brand goes well above 200k miles with basic maintenance. There's a long history here of re