Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rafaelmn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
361.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Lol at 5$ per kWh. In my country for home consumers the difference between day/night rates is 10-20c/kWh. With spot pricing I can see it working to cover the post commute power spike - but you're effectively doubling your com
362.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Access tokens are used for network calls so if the network is down nothing works anyway ?
363.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Sounds like deprecating a >10k battery pack on a >30k vehicle and reducing your max range with power cycles to earn pennies.
364.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
> and even here on HN a lot of people get very annoyed by the application of the "open source" label to model weights that don't have the source disclosure the EU calls for. That's because they are obviously trained o
365.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Not really with the EU data sources disclosure mindset, GDPR and all that. China has a leg up in the data game because they care about copyright/privacy and IP even less than US companies. EU is supposedly booting US companies because
366.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
EU software scene would take a decade to catch up. Only alternative being if AI really delivers on being a force multiplier - but even then EU would not have access to SOTA internally.
367.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
That's a tangential problem. HN tends to push up grifter hype slop, and there are a lot of those people around cause VC, but you can still see comments pushing back. Reading reddit reminds me of highschool forum arguments I've had
368.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
> Private data + data exfiltration (with no attacker-controlled data) is fine Because LLMs are not at all known for their hallucinations and misuse of tools - not like it could leak all your data to random places just because it decided
369.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
You didn't specify how you asked Claude to fix it here so hard to evaluate if it's giving you what you asked for or just choosing the wrong approach. It's one of the things these models will do - they will narrow down on what
370.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
And when building distributed systems a bunch of systems don't really care about those changes immediately anyway so the propagation delay is acceptable, or you can push the burden of refreshing to the client for privilege expansion ca
371.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
I think OP was saying that it's riskier for OTHERS in traffic - which should be the main thing with reissuing a drivers license. Like motorcycles are orders of magnitude higher risk for (including fatal) accidents - but they aren
372.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
That's ironic since I develop most of my Microsoft related tech with JetBrains products and only use vs code for frontend/node - non Microsoft stuff.
373.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
This is obviously wrong from genetic defects that cause predictable development problems in specialized areas. They are innate but not present at birth.
374.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Amazon bedrock ?
375.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
If it's some small isolated part or personal project I guess it doesn't matter - but I've seen a mature codebase that was started that way - and it was among the worst codebases I've seen in 20 years (of similar scale at
376.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
LINQ methods are higher order functions ? LINQ syntax is just sugar and probably a design mistake (dead weight feature that I've only seen abused to implement monadic composition by insane people). And Ruby doesn't even enter this
377.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
I'm going to go out on a limb and say because it's easiest to take whatever comes out looking interesting and sell it as a vibe ? Like if you asked a model to help you create a coffeeshop website for a demo, it started looking mor
378.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
I expect the opposite - hardware/compute going to be locked up in AGI quests unless the bubble pops and then it gets discounted
379.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
This is another dimension of the problem - what's even considered AI ? AlphaFold is a very specialized model - and I feel the AI boom is driven by hypothesis that general models eventually outperform specialized ones given enough size&
380.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
"How do I make EVs more flammable ?" On the flip side at least when they catch on fire they will probably burn cleaner ?
381.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Comments still turn up useful insights that you don't usually catch on other places, like the top one. I think the trend of low quality AI related crap getting to top of the front page is more annoying. Here's a formula you can tr
382.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
I got this keyboard : https://www.keebart.com/products/3w6 that uses mechanical low profile silent choc switches (Twilight Ambients Silent) and they are quieter than most non-mechanical keyboards. Eg. my Logitech Ergo
383.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
The colors scheme are like the definition of bland, theres zero punchy contrast, there's nothing popping. They show super smooth squiggly line as a "contrast" to a straight line in the play progress. Wow so brave, much courag
384.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Especially since it feels so bland and "corpo safe" - the only thing I have feelings about is selling this as expressive :D
385.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
>If a company starts offering a new AI model commercially, you simply send someone to audit it and make sure they can provide proof of consent, have their input data, etc. Good luck getting China to agree to this. So you just handicapped
386.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Even if you can enforce this somehow, other countries will not. Unlike copyright and patent law in consumer products and content - getting an upper hand in AI race could have huge implications down the line. So the only government that woul
387.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Thing is Dart is a shitty language with tradeoffs made specifically to make Flutter work well. The terrible meta programming support shows in basic things such as JSON serialization. It's like Java--, I can't think of a reason to
388.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
This is my point - Chrome isn't there to play dirty, it's there so competitors can't. But if it had to make money without Google all that BS would get bundled in the browser.
389.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
Have you started seeing browser embedded ads in Chrome ? It replacing competitor ads with it's own ? Rewriting referral links ? Pushing compromised extensions from "third parties" to siphon data they legally can't. Right
390.
▲
by
rafaelmn
1y ago
At 10-20$ a month that calculation is trivial to make. At a 100$ I'm honestly not getting that much value out of AI, especially not every month, and especially not compared to cheaper versions.
More ›