rado

44 ms·

1. 601.▲
   by rado 7y ago

   Common sense is back.
2. 602.▲
   by rado 7y ago

   Do. It. It's embarrassing when the industry sacrifices speed and quality for the sake of dev convenience.
3. 603.▲
   by rado 7y ago

   I guess the answer is no? Can’t tell outside the paywall.
4. 604.▲
   by rado 7y ago

   All I needed for my grids was display: table with row wrapping. I got magazine layouts instead with worse vertical alignment of cell content. CSS Grid is cool and does previously impossible things, but I wish the industry fixed old techniqu
5. 605.▲
   by rado 7y ago

   Don't tell me there is also a single country that controls the global (oil-trading) currency?
6. 606.▲
   by rado 7y ago

   What do you mean, "may"?
7. 607.▲
   by rado 8y ago

   Apple Mail
8. 608.▲
   by rado 8y ago

   Using Coda since 1.0 all day every day. 'Next' also looks great.
9. 609.▲
   by rado 8y ago

   Not to mention being tied to closed source USA-made currency
10. 610.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    But does the customer need it? To wait for the bundle to download and parse? Doesn't the customer deserve instant loading?
11. 611.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Hello, now I understand the main content area can be wider and the tabs are taking too much space on narrow screens. This can be improved in the future. Thanks
12. 612.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    List of tabs can be scrolled only by the tab key. Arrow keys are nice to have for sure. Thanks
13. 613.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Thanks, amended. Cheers
14. 614.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Thanks for the note, updated with more clarity. Cheers
15. 615.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Done, thanks!
16. 616.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Thanks, I should get on that. It lacks BS's limits like only one modal window, rounded edges etc. JS is not required, loading is seamless, the modal window actually works on iPhone Safari... The file size is less than half of Bootstrap
17. 617.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Hi, I got important feedback on 1.0 here years ago and every comment is valuable. The opinionation topic is very tricky, I thought a lot about that and decided to go unopinionated for maximum compatibility. On the other hand some CMSs simpl
18. 618.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Hi, there is no threshold. What is the issue at 1024px? Thanks.
19. 619.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    And the site allows that, it's just not very convenient.
20. 620.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    There is a custom full-page tabs element and arrow keys control it when focus is on body. When focus is inside a tab, arrow keys scroll as normal.
21. 621.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Thank you, adding rule to robots.txt. Regards
22. 622.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Will do that now, thank you.
23. 623.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    It's custom built upon the framework for a specific reason: to display components info, which is consumed by devs on laptop/desktop. Still accessible on phone, but that's not the target. Thanks
24. 624.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Because you don't read docs on a phone.
25. 625.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    This is only the docs site. It's native as in usable and accessible without JS.
26. 626.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Hi, the arrow keys do scroll. Is it a problem with natuive.net or the demos? Thanks
27. 627.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Hi, those are demos based on actual sites, in order to demonstrate versatility. Please describe what is odd and how it should be done properly? What would you want from such library/framework? Thanks
28. 628.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    It's like BS without opinionated style, dependencies, limitations (in embedding components) and bloat. Regards
29. 629.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Hi, this is the docs site. It shows info about the library/framework. Not a representation of a site built with the library/framework. Thanks
30. 630.▲
    by rado 8y ago

    Hi, this is a reference site. It's documentation for devs, not end customers. Not meant to be used on mobile.