radmuzom

141 ms·

571.
Tracking and Managing Group Expenditures – Patent Application(patents.stackexchange.com)
2 points by radmuzom 13y ago|0 comments
572.
X86 is Turing-complete with no registers(mainisusuallyafunction.blogspot.in)
2 points by radmuzom 13y ago|0 comments
573.
by radmuzom 13y ago
I guess that was sarcasm.
574.
The Two Silicon Valleys: One of Haves, One of Have-Nots(bits.blogs.nytimes.com)
37 points by radmuzom 13y ago|67 comments
575.
We are moving into the quantitative finance industry(fpcomplete.com)
51 points by radmuzom 13y ago|51 comments
576.
by radmuzom 13y ago
Such kind of blog posts are best written a year or two, where you have evidence that Microsoft will not be able to kill your business. In fact, I hope it happens and wish you all the best that your business grows and thrives. Otherwise, no
577.
by radmuzom 13y ago
I don't think the original article or people who despise Ad blocking software (like me) question the right of people to use ad-blockers. All we are saying is that economics and free markets will eventually take care of the problem, and
578.
by radmuzom 13y ago
Your comments are hypocritical - you are ok to allow companies with big budgets (e.g. Google) to pay off the makers of Ad Blocking software and continue to pay for these big budgets, while you are not ready to view a couple of ads on a smal
579.
by radmuzom 13y ago
Given that you have used the newspaper analogy, flipping over is not same as blocking ads - most of the time I do not even care to look at what Google shows me as ads as part of search results - that is the equivalent of flipping over. Bloc
580.
by radmuzom 13y ago
I wish I could upvote this a 1000 times. As most of the commentators do not care about the business model of publishers, publishers should actively fight back and prevent these people from viewing any of their content at all.
581.
Microsoft opens a futuristic Cybercrime Center in Redmond(thenextweb.com)
1 points by radmuzom 13y ago|0 comments
582.
How Microsoft Made the Right Bets on Azure(drdobbs.com)
1 points by radmuzom 13y ago|0 comments
583.
by radmuzom 13y ago
And yet, in 2013, I had to search in Google for hours, read a lot of documentation and tweak a lot of settings in order to 1. get AMD / Intel switchable graphics working in Ubuntu 2. stop the CPU fan from making too much noise!! Window
584.
by radmuzom 13y ago
This is a very common practice - even followed by Oreilly Safari and Linkedin for example. Anyone complaining about this is clearly biased without a reason.
585.
by radmuzom 13y ago
So true. You get an up vote for me.
586.
by radmuzom 13y ago
Huh? You are making it sound that EE answer ranking highly in Google is EE's fault and not the Google search algorithm. I would argue that almost any useful programming question I search for has SO as the first link which is then &quot
587.
by radmuzom 13y ago
You should change "Experts Exchange were dicks to users" to "Experts Exchange were dicks to users who want all their content for free". A lot of people, including me, have derived extreme value from EE over the years. An
588.
by radmuzom 13y ago
> Experts Exchange built their business on taking from many and giving to nobody. How is the Stack Overflow business model any different?
589.
by radmuzom 13y ago
Both. We were using IE6 till around 8 months back, because a lot of internal tools depended on IE6 behavior. Now you can imagine why I made the 50 year comment (agree that 100 might be too much).
590.
by radmuzom 13y ago
Yes, but unlike most programmers , people (restricted to bank employees in my original example) 1. Love windows, even though they may use an Iphone. 2. Find it very productive to get work done. That is because it IS a brilliant operating
591.
by radmuzom 13y ago
Amazon's core business is retail, not technology. I am excluding AWS, Mechanical Turk, etc. in this discussion. So selling the Kindle at a loss makes sense to them given that it will used by consumers to purchase retail goods (books, m
592.
by radmuzom 13y ago
It's written by a author who has very little clue that Microsoft's primary customers are large enterprises, and not the "average consumer". "Users have embraced the productivity of simple and mobile… And there’s no
593.
by radmuzom 13y ago
I am not familiar with the history of this project, but why was Apache trying to re-create the C++ standard library at all? Given that in GNU/Linux systems, the canonical implementation is the one provided by GCC (G++), and Microsoft p