quixoticelixer-

5 ms·

1.
by quixoticelixer- 4mo ago
I don't get why this is a big deal. All the calculators I've used have been rectangle.
2.
by quixoticelixer- 7mo ago
I really like AI and find it very useful, but it's certainly a good idea to keep it on a short leash because if you don't it can run away and get lost.
3.
by quixoticelixer- 7mo ago
Maybe the only place in the entire world where AI has improved the quality of writing.
4.
by quixoticelixer- 9mo ago
well if you read to the end of the article you might find out.
5.
by quixoticelixer- 2y ago
It does work there is just a bit more effort involved in setting it up
6.
by quixoticelixer- 2y ago
Yes i was charged $400 once for services i had running for three months without any idea it was happening
7.
by quixoticelixer- 2y ago
You can add penetrants to get it to work better with adding more glyphosate
8.
by quixoticelixer- 2y ago
What happens in summer?
9.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
Its good to trade temperature for humidity
10.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
Any grass can not cool the city by 5c
11.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
But they make it cooler more than they make it more humid
12.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
Native trees aren't always the 'best' option in modified urban environments. Just becuase they grew on what used to be there doesn't mean they will like what is there now
13.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
There isn't actually a strict definition of what is or isn't a forest
14.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
> Today's cost of atmospheric carbon capture is several hundred dollars / ton. For stuff like direct air capture, not for afforestation.
15.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
> First, there is no real way to tell if someone was going to do something anyway. There sort of is though, and both carbon off-setters and this study claim that they can Also there is plenty of demand in this market, even dodgy credits
16.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
The world isn't actually going to end.
17.
by quixoticelixer- 3y ago
This doesn't really change the fundamental argument
18.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
https://www.factsinstitute.com/ranking/countries-ranked-by-f...
19.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
> Are they clearly documenting how many times what content is being exactly censored why and then transparently publishing that to everyone ? Yes, they do
20.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
It turns out that the NZ government literally does have defacto control over what happens on facebook though.
21.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
No content was taken down solely for criticising politicians
22.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
You're probably american and therefore have less freedom than us
23.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
The levels in most flour etc is in the parts per billion. The long term effects are already pretty well known. It is not an issue
24.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
No strong selective pressure could not make it happen "pretty quick" it's very complicated behavior that would take a very long time to appear
25.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
Actually we would be better consuming more soybeans. Most of it goes to animal feed.
26.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
There is a very good reason why the remove weeds. It decreases yeilds and increases contamination by a lot
27.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
That would be bad. We would require much more area for the same output.
28.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
This won't help with breeding at all. You can already monitor plants lifecycle and yeild
29.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
How on earth would that be easier. Do you know how expensive greenhouses are?
30.
by quixoticelixer- 4y ago
It's much easier and much much faster and more effective to use chemicals.

More ›