quirkafleeg

15 ms·

61.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
That's not even remotely what he was saying people should be protected from WRT business.
62.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Nobody said vandalism is okay, nobody said graffiti is okay but only if done to other people's property, and this guy is not painting or stickering everything he wants, he's (non-destructively and for free) fixing bad signage.
63.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> All I can recall is few absurd billboards like "Fly Aeroflot!" (the only airline) There were many airlines (from different countries) flying to and from the USSR.
64.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
The zealous petulance displayed by Pewdiepie fans in this thread over anything that doesn't try to excuse his anti-Semitic remarks and behaviour is really weird.
65.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
I haven't seen him or any of his fans give any examples in his defence of other things he did that were not along the lines of "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "Death to all Jews", which I'd expect them to do if
66.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
His other crazy shit was to pay someone to say "Hitler did nothing wrong". When that guy, who was dressed as Jesus, was banned by Fiverr, Pewdiepie stated: "Isn't it ironic that Jews[1] found another way to fuck Jesus ov
67.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> There are a lot of 3rd parties in these market places that provide services such as chemical analysis of vendors products and make these results available. In fact, it goes as far as the very vendors selling the drugs pay to have their
68.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Weird how this post seems to have annoyed some people.
69.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Hopefully the fallout is that Cloudflare gets its act together. Even if your friends know 100% that they can't possibly have been negatively affected by tons of private information being dumped all over the internet, I'm not sure
70.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> So we get almost equal air time to UKIP (who are tiny) as to the Tories (who are in power) I don't like either of those parties, and they don't get even remotely equal airtime, but UKIP were the third most popular party in th
71.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Are you this confused when you see TV and movie reviews on the Guardian too? > Also: Who the ____ looks at HTML titles in the source code? Why are you now pretending you don't know where a page title is visible? > This is what I
72.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Or maybe they think having the word "opinion" in plain sight twice immediately above the headline, and again in the title of the page, is clear enough for most people.
73.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
This submission isn't about the Guardian's publishing habits. That's something you brought up a way to repeatedly grind an axe about "leftists" - using the word no fewer than five times already in three posts - in
74.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> It's sad how deep the Guardian has gone down the rabbithole in terms of writing exactly what lifestyle leftists- [snip] It's sad that posts like this, which don't even remotely attempt to address the subject, but simply
75.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
It's unbelievable that your posts are still black when they're full of such easily debunked false claims. See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13738236
76.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
If you meant a specific newspaper did not post about it before a specific date , then perhaps you should have said that, rather than instead making a completely different claim that isn't true. > Where is the NY Times citation, Was
77.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> MSM chose not to report the Anti-Defamation League statement about Ellison Do you seriously think you can make stuff up here and nobody is going to bother checking it? You literally just have to type Keith Ellison ADL into Google to
78.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Here are some images of Farage in the (right-wing) Daily Mail for contrast: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/21/1413910453638_Imag... http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2
79.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Here's a Google image search for Farage: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=nigel+farage&tbm=isch He's not exactly known for looking Churchillian.
80.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
As you're ignoring 99% of what I posted and your premise is simply "I'm not saying it was North Korea, but it was North Korea", then yes we can stop right here.
81.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> So they've identified them as suspects because, what? They just like to call random people suspects for no reason? If North Korea is being framed for this, why wouldn't they be pointing the finger at North Koreans? Even if
82.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> stated views of the Malaysian authorities conducting the actual investigation The Malaysian authorities have not blamed North Korea, so I'm not sure why you keep implying they have by posting this. > China has sanctioned North
83.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Haven't heard that before, but even if true people often move seats, so it wouldn't be very accurate.
84.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
The point of my post was to show there are completely legit reasons why they may have left that day, whereas it's simply being painted by the media as them fleeing the scene. If you have evidence that proves they were involved and my s
85.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
Why would they even bother denying it then, in that case? There's no advantage to North Korea of doing such an unnecessarily complicated and risky assassination in such a public and relatively secure place, when they could do it anywhe
86.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> North Korean suspect in custody Yes they've arrested a North Korean, along with a Malaysian, Indonesian and Vietnamese, in an investigation into the murder of a North Korean. > and Malaysian authorities have named, have CC foot
87.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
A lot of this seems funny to me. Immediately after the attack, before the Malaysians had even publicly named the victim, South Korean media was already reporting his identity, the cause of death (poisoning) and that it was carried out by tw
88.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
As it says in the article: Such an over-crowded flight would have caused problems in an emergency evacuation, aviation experts said, and passengers would not have had access to oxygen if it was suddenly required. Addit
89.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
You're right. Although I really wasn't intending negativity, I think it's good to have a reminder now and again to just stick to a point, and that some remarks probably aren't worth making and don't contribute anyth
90.
by quirkafleeg 10y ago
> According to the definition of the Declaration of Human Rights, they actually do. It doesn't matter how many times you mention the "Declaration of Human Rights", they actually do not. > Freedom of speech alone doesn&#

More ›