quibono

14 ms·

181.
by quibono 2y ago
I swear I've seen this cover before... is this a new release or an updated edition of an older book?
182.
by quibono 2y ago
> The 2->3 transition happened a long time ago at this point and I still run into lingering effects. Interesting. I read about this a lot and I feel like it's a gimmick at this point. What lingering effects of the Py2->Py3 tra
183.
by quibono 2y ago
Just my personal 2c. I've long been a big fan of Sidebery for vertical tab management, so I was expecting something closer to that than what I got. The vertical tab view does work, although it seems pretty basic. E.g. there's no w
184.
by quibono 2y ago
+1 - I get the same error. Running on Ubuntu 20.04
185.
by quibono 2y ago
Thank you for linking the SE thread! So this is the reason I've been having so much trouble with my Bt devices recently. I've used Linux as my daily for years but have also started dual-booting Windows as of a few weeks ago, and I
186.
by quibono 2y ago
I think I'd argue with both points actually. Though it also depends on the nature of work that you do. I imagine good intuition with linear algebra is crucial for novel work. If you're implementing a model off an arxiv paper maybe
187.
by quibono 2y ago
This seems to be a more hands-on linear algebra intro, starting with matrices and building up from there. Note I've not actually read the whole thing, just skimmed it. Something similar worth looking at is: https://ocw.mit.e
188.
by quibono 2y ago
TIL New Zealand have their own Alps!
189.
by quibono 2y ago
Gregory Chudnovsky is one of the Chudnovsky brothers responsible for the Chudnovsky algorithm for calculating digits of pi.
190.
by quibono 2y ago
> With a simple rectangular wing, the center of pressure is 1/4 of the way along the wing from the leading edge Is there a nice way to derive this? I find it interesting it's not the exact center though I guess it makes sense g
191.
by quibono 2y ago
Provided rewording, reordering and squashing (or fixing up, same thing really) are all you need I think you could argue this is true. Trying to do anything else tends to be a bit of a pain. On another note, is it possible not to lose the co
192.
by quibono 2y ago
I guess it depends on what you mean by a complicated command.
193.
by quibono 2y ago
I've not used GitUp so I'm not sure how much help this will be to you since I can't objectively compare the two. As an example, let's say I want to remove some changes from a commit (and potentially move those into one o
194.
by quibono 2y ago
Personally I am squarely in the rebase team although I'm not completely anti-merge. I find the interactive rebase to be so useful that I pretty much never rebase non-interactively. I wonder if part of the reason the merge flow is more
195.
by quibono 2y ago
Interesting. I'm not sure about $ and ^ either but I think I'd keep getting confused about which one of < and > meant pushing vs pulling
196.
by quibono 2y ago
I agree. I think that most of the time highly specialized topics have a lot of subtle context required. You either communicate all of that, or use jargon to get around it. In some cases I think it's possible to do this and satisfy both
197.
by quibono 2y ago
Nice game! I played it yesterday and came back to it today as well. One question, and I think you partly already answered it - are the boards generated manually?
198.
by quibono 2y ago
Fair enough. Though I don't understand how that relates to your original point. For what it's worth I can _kinda_ understand the point that Guido's making here.
199.
by quibono 2y ago
Does it, though? This is the first time I'm hearing about this. In fact I'd say that Python is known for the complete opposite (e.g. wrt lambdas, map, filter etc)
200.
by quibono 2y ago
Quora is gamed to the point where it's pretty much useless.
201.
by quibono 2y ago
I love DataGenetics, lots of interesting puzzles like that on there. There's a very unique style to all the visualizations and the solutions/analyses are always clear. Sadly, there was a post by the author in June 2019 about being
202.
by quibono 3y ago
Thank you for this, this looks great!
203.
by quibono 3y ago
> Transforms like wavelet and laplace are closer to "real world" because of fewer non-physical assumptions and have actual physical implementations. Could you expand on this a bit please? Especially as it relates to the Laplace
204.
by quibono 3y ago
> I feel this often gets lost when people approach the Fourier transform from a more engineering perspective, not at least because we often do the transform to throw away unwanted information, like certain frequency components. That was
205.
by quibono 3y ago
I really like the article and the presentation! With that in mind, is this style of presentation (i.e. different elements jumping out or moving into focus as you scroll down the page) easily doable OOTB with any JS libs? Or is this pretty m
206.
by quibono 3y ago
Fair point. However, being programmable was one of the requirements listed in the article. Was the Antikythera mechanism actually programmable or was its calculation set in stone through its physical design?
207.
by quibono 3y ago
Depending on what you're doing this can be really annoying.
208.
by quibono 3y ago
Yes, at least in the UK. From working through some US university curricula - it's also present there as well.
209.
by quibono 3y ago
I believe the following has the symmetry based solution you mention (and more!) https://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath668/kmath668.htm
210.
by quibono 3y ago
Oh sorry, I didn't realise you were OP :) Thanks!

More ›