Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
quesera
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
66 ms
·
601.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Thank you for the link and the recommendation! I'm just, you know, sort of neurotic about certain things, and I know I'm not alone here on HN. :)
602.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
That's puttering, tinkering, or experimenting. It's a good thing. Bikeshedding is wasting time on trivial and pointless efforts or discussions. It's a bad thing. :) https://phk.freebsd.dk/sagas/bikeshed&#
603.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Tracking and other such indignities removed: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07FSFBSXY
604.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
> There was a tiny amount of it played on college radio, but it would be something like one show a week from 2 AM to 3 AM on Sunday morning > We found things. ... No one curated it for us. I think you're getting to the essenc
605.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
100 microyears?
606.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
... and they have decided to ignore you as a customer, because the risk of allowing VoIP numbers is greater than you are valuable. So, everybody wins. :(
607.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Twilio has a lookup API, which returns the subscriber name and carrier. Here's an example response (subscriber name redacted): { "data": { "name": "LASTNAME, FIRSTNAME", "line_prov
608.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
From a pure economics perspective, this is healthy for the business. There are always low performers. Periodically transitioning out the bottom 10% or so, and rehiring different people, possibly in a different departmental distribution, i
609.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
You might be overestimating the profitability of selling underwater real estate.
610.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Perl was great! But perl came and went. Shell scripts are forever. So far.
611.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Does that mean you develop code without running it locally? The first execution of new code is in CI?
612.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
But my point is that one of those statements will exist in every filing. If the corp has never been profitable, the first. Otherwise, the second. They mean absolutely nothing about what management expects for the future of the company. Th
613.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Yes, that's absolutely what they write. They will always be explicit that they could be wrong in disastrous ways and they are not misleading you into thinking otherwise. Every public corp's "official stated position"
614.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
> in their IPO filing That's meaningless -- just legal boilerplate. No one wants to be sued for their dog & pony show sales pitch, so they always hedge by including explicit doom & gloom scenarios in the legal paperwork.
615.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
You might also enjoy this: > The story of how Queen Elizabeth handled an encounter with an American hiker who did not recognise her, recounted by a former bodyguard who was with her that day https://www.reuters.com/world&
616.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
You're right. Marketing is expensive. Distribution is cheap these days, but often the two functions are colocated. I would even posit that many popular creative works are commercially worthless, absent the expensive marketing. And in s
617.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
> The creative industry isn’t wildly profitable There are a lot of profits in the industry, but as I think you're alluding to, not a great proportion of those profits go to the creators. I want a model where I can compensate artis
618.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Good point. Of course this presumes that we understand the physics at that scale, and that there's nothing akin to a quantum tunneled nervous system, etc.
619.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
If you test defensively[0], CI will catch the vast majority of functional bugs. Anything that is missed suggests at least two bugs: one in tests, and one in business logic.[0] A reliable deployment pipeline is outside of CI, but can be ke
620.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
If one can disbelieve the Primacy of the Pope, and instead that the Pretender wearing the Pope's garments is in fact the anti-Christ, and still believe they are an adherent of Catholicism, then they have asserted a Schism in the Church
621.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
You are making my point.
622.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Do you call yourself a Googler after you quit? You, and they, can use whatever labels serve your, or their, purpose. But at some point it doesn't make much sense, or have much meaning, to do so. I'm a Catholic.
623.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
It strikes me as fairly irrelevant what Catholics call ex-Catholics. I don't think you can (edit: reasonably) call yourself a Catholic if you do not adhere to certain tenets of the Catholic Church. (This is where I was going with the c
624.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
I was 100% of the impression that GP was comparing petroleum resources, and explicitly not climate, traditional dress, or human rights.
625.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
This seems a bit much. In the DVCS era, we have inexpensive branching. Do as thou wilt on your topic or epic branches. Rebase them against main/master before merging upwards. Fix what must be fixed first. Main/master branch should
626.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Actually not known for atmospheric wind, but for bloviating in a windy way. With the construction of tall city blocks and the breezes off of Lake Michigan, the atmospheric use has become somewhat more true. No more so than most USAmerican c
627.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Ah right. So "for those issues on which doctrine is silent, we will use my opinion". We'll call it "natural law", to suggest that it comes from somewhere other than some random human. Got it.
628.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
I'm pretty sure you cease to be a Catholic when you call the Pope the anti-Christ. Infallible, God's representative on Earth, etc. Though in USAmerica, we're pretty flexible on the meaning of "Christian" anyway. Cer
629.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
Also interestingly "The USA" and "The US" (en_US) both translate to "Los EE. UU." (es_MX, es_ES). Not to be confused with "The EU" (en_US) which is "La UE" (es_ES).
630.
▲
by
quesera
1y ago
We had them in the US too. Tray-based CD players had a separate, smaller, indent of about 2.5" (6.35cm :) diameter which would accept them.
More ›