quadcore

38 ms·

1. 391.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   Would that emit large quantity of CO2 in the atmosphere?
2. 392.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   What if I use a bitcoin node and not an exchange?
3. 393.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   we look forward reading all your feedbacks Let me propose my humble (and free) help for the anglish: zero sept sixsixsix 809 65, Ill send you my email address by sms / whatsapp.
4. 394.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   Real question: how is bitcoin not preserving privacy (heard that a lot), how can you link an address to a person?
5. 395.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   If you are happy, dont touch anything, would be my internet advice.
6. 396.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   Interesting there is this new series on Netflix, StartUp about this stuff. So the question really is "does it work?". Couldn't this be interesting for that it will force us to change the way we code? For sure the best paradig
7. 397.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   Very fun. My suggestion would be add sounds like "triple kill", "killing spree".
8. 398.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   There might be something deeply interesting in that news actually. 'initialised = true' is obviously a bad pattern, now people cant argue about it anymore. Why is it bad? Obviously, if you forgot the line then... BOOM. So instead
9. 399.▲
   by quadcore 5y ago

   This is basically the principle behind a tech on top of bitcoin called lighning network: https://lightning.network
10. 400.▲
    by quadcore 5y ago

    I disagree with most comments. Thing is simpler than that. Just dont take it too seriously. They do their best to get some shit done and if it fails, it fails. They gave you some instructions, do the best you can with it, get back to your f
11. 401.▲
    by quadcore 5y ago

    Mmh I'm not convinced. There is pattern in aggressiveness. One of them being the harasser is talking about the victim or something that's strongly linked to the victim (like it's work, member of familly, etc).
12. 402.▲
    by quadcore 5y ago

    I wonder if we could detect harassment today in a chat for example. With like GPT3 or something.
13. 403.▲
    by quadcore 5y ago

    I dont know if you've noticed, but most programmers actually do care about performances. They just are bad at it. Software are slow precisely because programmers dont get it: optimising all the code will make slow software. They spend
14. 404.▲
    by quadcore 5y ago

    Can someone explains a bit more what it's all about for outsiders so we can understand whats intellectually interesting in that news?
15. 405.▲
    by quadcore 6y ago

    Duke was particularly good in multiplayer because all the guns were useful and balanced. For example, the starting gun was deadly at distance. The shrinker would give you an instant frag if you could catch the little guy. The rocket launche
16. 406.▲
    by quadcore 6y ago

    * In fact, we’re certain that all four major engines of economic growth – communication, transportation, manufacturing, and energy production – will be anchored in space within 20 years.* Can you elaborate on the possibilities here, maybe t
17. 407.▲
    by quadcore 6y ago

    Easy: when this platform will have a killer app other platforms cant have.
18. 408.▲
    by quadcore 6y ago

    Striked, I find funny that searching the web still has the same user experience than in the 90' while most web sites are now apps. Feels like this model is outdated.
19. 409.▲
    by quadcore 6y ago

    That comment made my day. Those laws are a pain in the ass for Digital Nomads for example which is a growing population.
20. 410.▲
    Fortnite will reportedly be playable on iOS again through Nvidia’s GeForce Now(theverge.com)

    1 points by quadcore 6y ago|0 comments
21. 411.▲
    by quadcore 6y ago

    I wonder if species can reappear like they appeared in the first place, with evolution schemes.
22. 412.▲
    by quadcore 6y ago

    I would like to know to what degree can the observed difference be attributed to culture I believe you can have a grasp of the magnitude of it by thinking that people are the product of their birth (genes and whatever) and their experienc
23. 413.▲
    Ask HN: What wiki do you use for software dev project

    1 points by quadcore 6y ago|0 comments
24. 414.▲
    by quadcore 7y ago

    Paul Graham's tutorial on arc/lisp: http://ycombinator.com/arc/tut.txt oh the link is broken :)
25. 415.▲
    by quadcore 7y ago

    I love it. A suggestion is to have something for parallel computations because personally I know I won't even try a language that doesn't have something for that. I think the way the language handles parallelism is key to its desi
26. 416.▲
    by quadcore 7y ago

    At least, I may agree with the following: bad program infers bad presentation but bad presentation does not infer bad program. In my career, I've seen many times peer programmers laugh at me when looking at my code and subsequently kee
27. 417.▲
    by quadcore 7y ago

    it seems that in real life, a really high-quality codebase is hard to come by I think a common misconception amongst mid-experienced programmers is that they confuse look with quality. Reading clean written code gives you a feeling of con
28. 418.▲
    by quadcore 7y ago

    I believe this is an opening for a proof that this world is really a simulation. Or that we are missing some physical laws. I wonder if it's not kind of all the same ultimately. What difference do you make between a simulation and a
29. 419.▲
    by quadcore 7y ago

    Most programmers work in passes, and don't write everything in one shot. But a common mistake I see is not doing enough passes still. Programmers jump on making polished commits they can show off to their peers. Instead, what should be
30. 420.▲
    by quadcore 7y ago

    "hey, this framework seems hellish, we might face some problems" The problem if you think about it is that you will tell him just that every time you see him. In other words, how do you show that you know how to make a good fr