quad9_dre

22 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by quad9_dre 9y ago

   Totally understand, we are trying to find the right balance for those that need options. We can always shift how we present things, configurations, technologies implemented etc based on end users feedback. We really do want folks to help us
2. 2.▲
   by quad9_dre 9y ago

   god I love this place. :) I know the PCH guys will see this post, so hopefully we can move the needle a bit more on this side of things. Thanks for taking the time to poke and provide feedback.
3. 3.▲
   by quad9_dre 9y ago

   As you hinted at (i think this is where you were going with it), as our caches get nice and toasty the latency should start to come down a bit. Then as we add more nodes to the anycast cloud, that will also help. Finnally as we continue to
4. 4.▲
   by quad9_dre 9y ago

   We do have another IP tied to the anycast cloud on a different /8. 149.112.112.112 - blocking, no edns (same setup/config as 9.9.9.9) I will see about adding this to the list of things to add to documentation. (thanks for the fee
5. 5.▲
   by quad9_dre 9y ago

   Thanks for this, we will see what we can do to run this down.
6. 6.▲
   by quad9_dre 9y ago

   I am assuming you are talking about the website? We should be working on that front right now.
7. 7.▲
   by quad9_dre 9y ago

   We currently support DNS over TLS, and are looking at other options in the space. So if folks want dnscrypt I can take that feedback back to the team and see what we can do for you guys. From my perspective the calculation on private encry