Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qsera
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
181.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Sorry. I don't want immune system hacks. I don't want to throw a monkey wrench to some system that was created by random tweaks over millions of years and cost millions and millions of lost lives to perfect.
182.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
>Have you read the IPCC report? Do you have any kind of physics education and experience in real world thermodynamics at scale? No and no, but I find it alarming when even trivial questions regarding reliability of methods used to estima
183.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Any non-trivial project done at scale for any realistic duration won't work with this procedure. Just consider this for a minute. If re-writes were so trivial, we would be re-writing software all of the time, even before LLMs. It is th
184.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
> rare 99% consensus among scientists Any groups of humans can easily reach "consensus" that are wrong.
185.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
That is quite unreliable. I would bet that your spec will be out of sync with the program behavior in no time. The only thing that will work is to have non-llm generated tests. But writing those require thinking, which is what we are trying
186.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
>a question for which you would have no response to. I have. Humans can feel.
187.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
>With that concept in mind, it's clear how they can be made to "give up". They can, but they need to be trained specifically on that behavior. They can be trained specifically to not generate textual description of things
188.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Well it could miss relevant things to include in the spec.
189.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
>just throw the code away and rebuild it What about all the undocumented "adjustments" ("bug fixes" in a professional context) that were made to make it actually useful?
190.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
>They're problem-solving and efficiently dealing with obstacles They are problem solving as much as a falling rock is finding its path down a mountain.
191.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
> instead just call defeat and say “I’m not sure how to proceed next”. Because that is fundamentally impossible given how they work... The thing does not even know when it succeeds or fails. Actually the thing does not "know" a
192.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Yea, the other guy also want me to stop thinking...
193.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
>why would Earth be that incredibly unique? I think the answer to the question is easy if we consider quantum mechanics. It says every possible random event manifests in some universe. This means that an event or combination of events, n
194.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
At least there is some hope for that for the side who believes they can think.
195.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Temperature measurements and "trends" in the distant past which the current "crisis" is built on, is based on methods that seem to be very unreliable and dependent on some unjustifiable assumptions.
196.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Why go to the ocean, because that happens everywhere, non-stop. If your immune system stops working, then you are a dead man.
197.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Actually I don't think there is life outside of Earth. I think we are truly alone in this universe.
198.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Origin of life on earth is not very interesting to me. Origin of life in the universe is where it is at...
199.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
At least I am falling to the best kind of propaganda. While the other side, who does not apparently even believe they're "thinking on their own", is falling to a much poorer one...
200.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Yea, it is as if some people can still think on their own...
201.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
>Another factor is that rich oil and gas people figured out they could just buy the media. Yea, they figured it just now, in the 2010s and 20s. During the 90's the thought just didn't occur to them...Makes complete sense. Nothi
202.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
How much wind power can we extract before we disrupt the global wind circulation and thus the climate regulation by winds? Is no one worried about this?
203.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Jesus, how are the other living things existing at all?
204.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
In couple of years data compression will have progressed so much that you ll be able to store all the data in the world on a floppy disk!
205.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Knock yourselves out: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48890730
206.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
Everything, every. single. thing. that can cause people to spend money on, will be ultimately manipulated. Will be true as long as humanity exists.
207.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
> It's not science, but also a lot of stuff that purports to be science is not. "Science" is subject to many of the same forces that politics is. I am glad that people are finally waking up to this.
208.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
> Saying "lines of code are a bad measurement" is too easy! It's about time someone presented an opposing argument. Why though? The only entities who would be interested in such an implication is the AI marketing. No one r
209.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
I think we would, at some point realize that the roles of PM and QA are best done by an LLM, while coding is left to humans. So an 180 from the current coding-automation frenzy..
210.
▲
by
qsera
2mo ago
I don't think volume of code changed was the metric the other commenter was asking for.
More ›