qsera

10 ms·

211.
by qsera 2mo ago
What is amusing to me is when I think about what happens when the so called "experts" have this effect? Because "experts" are people too...
212.
by qsera 2mo ago
> The Dunning-Kruger effect Other wise known as "Trust the experts" effect. I understand why this has 100+ votes.
213.
by qsera 2mo ago
>If the research can't demonstrate the DK effect, then the research is bad, like poorly designed. Why do the research if you are so convinced from your own personal anecdotes? Quite a weird thing to say...
214.
by qsera 2mo ago
> No, you openly, plainly went and downgraded your claim.. Prove it!
215.
by qsera 2mo ago
>to a measly "you can't train a useful robotics LLM because there's not enough data".. This was the claim from the very beginning. You should have asked why I think what I think, instead of leading with "the enti
216.
by qsera 2mo ago
I have not overlooked anything. I had imagined that this "mapping", to have any power, would also need to be handled by an LLM (action expert). But here is the problem with that. That would not be as "intelligent" as an
217.
by qsera 2mo ago
ELM being a lot more popular than Haskell with mostly the same syntax would indicate that it is not the syntax, that people find hard with Haskell.
218.
by qsera 2mo ago
As I suspected you are fooled by this video and imagine it to be capable of much more than what is shown. This video is pretty non-marketing and is quite straight to the point. But that does not prevent you from being awed! So What is LLM i
219.
by qsera 2mo ago
Should be trivial to link to one then...
220.
by qsera 2mo ago
I want to know, or care, about zero details about an artist, except their name, (so that I can find their other works). period.
221.
by qsera 2mo ago
Show me one video where a robot follows textual prompts and come up with its own movements to solve the prompt.
222.
by qsera 2mo ago
You are repeating "It can be done, trust me!". But that is not very convincing.
223.
by qsera 2mo ago
I wish you took Haskell's syntax as such. Why did you mix rust and possibly other stuff with it?
224.
by qsera 2mo ago
>But your entire premise is wrong regardless of that. You don't understand what I am saying. The crux of your misunderstanding is here >emitting text that maps to useful action sequences If you have a static mapping from text to
225.
by qsera 2mo ago
-1000$. I use LLMs for free and get the best value out of them by not using them for coding.
226.
by qsera 2mo ago
It is just marketing speak to evoke some similarity to Sci-fi movies show AI robots learning stuff by quickly going books. Nothing of the sort happens here though... So you are not missing anything. What you think is exactly what it is. Jus
227.
by qsera 2mo ago
> Why should anyone take your personal idiosyncratic definition of value seriously... so that they get more value out of their $$$...or else feel free to part all your cash on the newest piece of shit. I don't really care. An idiot
228.
by qsera 2mo ago
Yea, and I don't think I missed something. To be clear, I don't want the "knowledge in the book", I want the content of the book itself so that I can form my own knowledge. So don't not want an LLMs regurgitation of
229.
by qsera 2mo ago
Action LLMs work by generating text underneath. Just some higher level software interprets the text generated and do some action. So the immediate inference result is still text. That does not help a lot.
230.
by qsera 2mo ago
>They are making that knowledge more widely available in a digital form. Where can I access the digital form of the destroyed books? You should know since you made this statement, right?
231.
by qsera 2mo ago
I didn't say everyone else is stupid. I said (or meant) consumers show largely/collectively stupid behavior that I described.
232.
by qsera 2mo ago
They are cheap because they are old, and people are so stupid that they think if something is old, it should be worthless.
233.
by qsera 2mo ago
>they're probably quite common titles. Old books could have been common back in their day, but they might not be very common today.
234.
by qsera 2mo ago
>why is that not reflected in their prices? Because the consumers are stupid and think being "new" is worth a lot more, for some reason, when it comes to art/literature/movies. So they are willing to pay more for new
235.
by qsera 2mo ago
>Greek philosophers could do their time's science because their economy allowed them to have time to think and food to eat and didn't have to go working in the fields. And they passed on their fair share of wrong beliefs that h
236.
by qsera 2mo ago
Internet and the ad/marketing/propoganda/pr powers that comes with it..
237.
by qsera 3mo ago
Of course it will appear BS to you. That is why it works.
238.
by qsera 3mo ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49120855 Summary: 1. "Science" can only correct when economics allows it to do so. 2. True believers of science who are ever apologetic to the problems with contemporary scient
239.
by qsera 3mo ago
Your "scientific method" can only correct the "mistakes" as long as economics allows it. A wrong belief held "scientifically" will go on and on if there is sufficient economic incentives to make it go on....And
240.
by qsera 3mo ago
If someone can make a robot that can keep a house and surroundings clean and pretty, it is going to sell like hot cakes..

More ›