qsera

30 ms·

871.
by qsera 8mo ago
Yea, They all should "feel" some kind of craving.
872.
by qsera 8mo ago
Yes, makes sense. But may be there is also an upside. May be it would actually cause the people to take notice of what is going on around them and actually starting to use their brains (to make predictions) instead of simply consuming 24x7
873.
by qsera 8mo ago
>"Pushing it underground" discourages the majority of bettors from using it, and that is a good thing. But don't you think that will be the "good" majority? And the "bad" minority will continue using th
874.
by qsera 8mo ago
So you are saying that if business entity starts a pharma company that creates a drug for some kind of novel disease, but the disease does not currently exist, they will take steps to make an epidemic of it more likely?
875.
by qsera 8mo ago
>A stock market crash is also a pretty big event that cannot be suppressed or silenced, but they still happen regularly. I don't see the connection. Are you implying that it should have stopped people from investing?
876.
by qsera 8mo ago
> a fear of flying.. Flying is safe, but I think it is not because some rules/regulations or due to "science". A plane falling out of sky is a pretty big event and cannot be suppressed or silenced. It affects a large numbe
877.
by qsera 8mo ago
I think it is easier to be polite always and not switch between polite and non-polite mode depending on who you are talking to.
878.
by qsera 8mo ago
But if most software is created by user, then where does this reference piece come from?
879.
by qsera 8mo ago
You are invested in some kind of AI start up, right?
880.
by qsera 8mo ago
No, but I think I got my answer.
881.
by qsera 8mo ago
>LLMs can turn plain English into a software tool in the matter of minutes. Unless LLMs can read minds, no one will bother to specify, even in plain english with the required level of detail. And that is assuming the user has the detai
882.
by qsera 8mo ago
Another user had already written what I had in mind when I responded to your comment.. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47387570
883.
by qsera 8mo ago
>highly complex mapping Curious. Can you elaborate on this a bit?
884.
by qsera 8mo ago
> It would add special exceptions to general code instead of determining that the general rule should be refined or changed. That is pretty bad..
885.
by qsera 8mo ago
Yes, LLMs can be a better search tool.
886.
by qsera 8mo ago
>most software used is created by the user You really believe that?
887.
by qsera 8mo ago
>beat some cost-comparable UpWork professionals in both quality and spec adherence... I am not sure I want to keep paying for something that needs some amount of luck on my side, to be useful. Writing elaborate plans for LLMs also feels
888.
by qsera 8mo ago
Oh, I was not comparing it with out-sourced development and was instead comparing it with developing it oneself. Sure, outsourcing is similar, but the difference is one uses a process that is inherently probabilistic and will show up in eve
889.
by qsera 8mo ago
>That should be good for at least a few things. Right? The example you described, no. It is not good because its quality and adherence to the spec (the single sentence) is and will always be probabilistic...
890.
by qsera 8mo ago
Internet enabled instant to access to all human knowledge as well as instant chit-chat across the globe. Guess what humanity choose to drown itself in? So combine both facts here in context, with human nature, and you ll see where this wil
891.
by qsera 8mo ago
>this is obviously partly guess work Ah..That makes sense. Because nothing you were saying making any sense to me.
892.
by qsera 8mo ago
>The problem is that you can't just verify everything yourself.. But one should be free to reject (in the sense that they should be free not to depend on it, or take decisions based on it) things that they did not themselves verify.
893.
by qsera 8mo ago
They are never right, even when they are right; they are only right 50 years down the road....at which point no one cares..
894.
by qsera 8mo ago
>And I'll also caution, again, that reasoning based on anecdotes can be distorted both ways... I will go further and say that if you can clearly see how the incentives are aligned, even anecdotes are not necessary. >If you see fr
895.
by qsera 8mo ago
>We do what we do, not because of motivation So you are saying a living thing will try to feed even if it does not feel hunger?
896.
by qsera 8mo ago
>Bitbucket is a neglected product... Long time user here, Why do you think it is neglected?
897.
by qsera 8mo ago
When I said, "feel good/feel bad", I meant it as an umbrella term to cover all such positive/negative things. So back to the point, there is no inherent motivation for LLMs/Machines, because they cannot feel. Where
898.
by qsera 8mo ago
Yea, pseudo autonomous driving and all that..
899.
by qsera 8mo ago
So can you please describe the kind of coding that you had success with by using LLMs.
900.
by qsera 8mo ago
That is the point. It is nonsense to delegate your responsibility to something that is neither accountable nor reliable if you care about not tanking your reputation..

More ›