Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qsera
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
901.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
> but the assembly code was so incomprehensible Wait, I thought you said it understood everything..
902.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
If you don't really understand how LLMs of today are made possible, it is really easy to fall into the trap of thinking that it is just a matter of time and compute to attain perpetual progress..
903.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
Humans are accountable, an LLM subscription is not..
904.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>anyway with Junior devs.. A junior dev is accountable, but an LLM subscription is not.
905.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>I only get the hardest problems to solve. So do you review all that code your LLM generates for you?
906.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
Just curious. What stuff did you make before the LLMs, with regular coding?
907.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
> teasing out the actual intent of what you want better. Do you mean they ask clarifying questions before generating a response?
908.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>it's just our nature Yea, its our nature to feel good about it, which is what evolution does. If you are curious, and if exploration makes you feel good, you have a better chance to survive, and you pass that trait along. I can
909.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>The scientific version of these claims is “the total encoding cost (for some class of tasks) is lower than previous models” I wonder why? Can the new models read mind? > For example, I was recently trying to install a package whose n
910.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
> How do you see emotion as being necessary for creativity? As its reward. Why should anyone be creative if it does not "feel" good? >releasing chemicals like adrenaline, dopamine.. That does not explain how it results in a
911.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>The fundamental problem with today's LLMs that will prevent them from achieving human level intelligence, and creativity, is that they are trained to predict training set continuations, which creates two very major limitations: I a
912.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>methods are technically challenging. And finanacially too.. >Science really is self-correcting.. When economy allows it....
913.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>It's career-ending.. That is where being good at politics come into play. And if you are good at it, instead of being career-ending, fraud will put you in the highest of the positions! No one wants a "plant" who cannot na
914.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
There is a saying in my native language that goes something like "If you mix poison and milk, the milk will turn poisonous, instead of poison becoming milk (aka beneficial)". I guess, to convert it into this context, we can say th
915.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
> cranking up the innate immune system all the time reduced illness with no downsides But isn't that what the adjuants that are currently in nearly every vaccine do anyway. That is forcing the triggering of immune response when ther
916.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
It is not actually the gaps in capability, and instead it arises from an understanding of how it works and an honest acknowledgement of how far it could go.
917.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
The question is not if these things are actually intelligent or not. The question is if these things will be useful without an endless supply of training data and continuous re-alignment using it.. And the questions "Are these things r
918.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
I think The best place where AI can help in software development is helping with reviews, not doing development. But AI marketing would not like to promote it, may because it is less dramatic and does not involve a paradigm shift or somet
919.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
TIL Thanks!
920.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
> If they submitted bad code... The core issue is that it takes a large amount of effort to even assess this, because LLM generated code looks good superficially. It is said that static FP languages make it hard to implement something if
921.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
> people to shirk that responsibility. Actually not shrink, but just transfer it to reviewers.
922.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
> You're saying that because we can't fix or prevent everything, then we should choose not to fix or prevent anything? No, it is just being realist. Public discourse is like wind. It comes and goes. But incentive based motivato
923.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
I think clients who care about getting good software will eventually require that LLMs are not directly used during the development. I think one way to compare the use of LLMs is that it is like comparing a dynamically typed language with a
924.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
So how did it manage to gain wide adoption originally?
925.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
So how does writes work? Does an analog signal translate into pit-lengths with absolute precision?
926.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
I vote against this (and this is coming from some one who believes HN contains a lot of shills) Bots are recognizable and can be selectively ignored. But an echo chamber that would result from measures like this cannot be, because you canno
927.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>Alibaba Group
928.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
What I am surprised is the fact that people expect everything to be an exception to Goodhart's law, by default.
929.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
Lookup how these "fixes" are implemented and please go back and read my original comment.
930.
▲
by
qsera
8mo ago
>100 is my answer We both know that it is not true. Because by this logic, you wouldn't fire a weapon at someone who is about to stab your wife or child. Because there is a small chance that they will die of a heart attack before th
More ›