qsera

26 ms·

751.
by qsera 7mo ago
>internalize the concepts. This gives the impression that it is doing something more than pattern matching. I think this kind of communication where some human attribute is used to name some concept in the LLM domain is causing a lot of
752.
by qsera 7mo ago
>we would still have access to capable agents. But they would be outdated, right? Would an agent that can only code in COBOL would be as useful today?
753.
by qsera 7mo ago
>The thing is, agents aren’t going away... Aren't they currently propped up by investor money? What happens when the investors realize the scam that it is and stop investing or start investing less...
754.
by qsera 7mo ago
Why not for everyone?
755.
by qsera 7mo ago
Yes, this is why I use them, but try not to apply the suggestions blindly. So as time goes by I need to depend less on those..
756.
by qsera 7mo ago
Oh, I thought you were genuinely wondering...
757.
by qsera 7mo ago
Go count the number of questions in your comment..
758.
by qsera 7mo ago
Fuzz testing has existed long before LLMs...
759.
by qsera 7mo ago
Sure, but that is not what the OP talks about.
760.
by qsera 7mo ago
Can't you count? Are you an LLM?
761.
by qsera 7mo ago
>Don’t make me cite George Hinton or other preeminent experts to show you how wrong you all are. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvNCVYkHKfg
762.
by qsera 7mo ago
>let the LLM worry about the HOW. You mean, let the LLM hallucinate about the HOW...
763.
by qsera 7mo ago
This is not an appeal to authority, but this video probably contains the answers to your questions if you are open minded about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvNCVYkHKfg
764.
by qsera 7mo ago
Even worse is the "true believers" who without any sort of justification will just declare that "everyone is cooked!"..
765.
by qsera 7mo ago
>who's delighted with it A programmer who is not delighted by programming cannot be very good at it. So the same people who are "delighted" by using an LLM is the exact same people who should not be using it. It would be l
766.
by qsera 7mo ago
It doesn't actually understand anything...let alone code. And I think you are the one who is in denial.
767.
by qsera 7mo ago
>I don't get why some people are so convinced that this is inevitable. Someone once said that It is hard to make a man understand things if their profit depends on them not understanding it...
768.
by qsera 7mo ago
> it's looking like assessment and evaluation are massive bottlenecks. So I think LLMs have moved the effort that used to be spent on fun part (coding) into the boring part (assessment and evaluation) that is also now a lot bigger..
769.
by qsera 7mo ago
The whole shtick of LLMs is that it can do stuff without telling it explicitly. Not sure why people are blamed because they are using it based on that expectation....
770.
by qsera 7mo ago
Maybe, but that does not mean that it is possible to work around evolution to change ourselves to fit better with the new constraints.
771.
by qsera 7mo ago
An always full alert immune system won't have any lee way to address any onset of an infection, and also considering that pathogens also evolve to by pass the increased alertness, this will probably be catastrophic for the species. Tha
772.
by qsera 7mo ago
It does not negate the knowledge that we do have. But we should also acknowledge that certain undertakings are impossible to do safely with the amount of knowledge that we do have.
773.
by qsera 7mo ago
>our biological and environmental reality is substantially different. As true as it might be, that does not mean that it is possible to work around evolution to change ourselves to fit better with the new reality.
774.
by qsera 7mo ago
Don't we have a problem of ever increasing auto-immune diseases? If we know "enough" then I think we should be able to make it go away. Until that happens, I don't think humanity can claim to know "enough". Als
775.
by qsera 7mo ago
>We're not really calorie constrained anymore Why do you bring this up? It seems a weird hypothesis to bring up given that the parent comment did not suggest the possibility...
776.
by qsera 7mo ago
Yea, so what is the point in this context?
777.
by qsera 7mo ago
It might be guess work, but it has got a ruthless filter called natural selection and really long time to get here. So I don't see your point. It is really tuning for surviving within the constrains.
778.
by qsera 7mo ago
> Code review is the real deal for these models. Yea, that is what I have been saying as well... >Instead, people seem to be infatuated with vibe coding technical debt at scale. Don't blame them. That is what AI marketing pushes.
779.
by qsera 7mo ago
But that just means more $$$ for the pharma, so not sure why that would bother them.
780.
by qsera 7mo ago
>we can do better because we're purposeful. "Purposeful" does not help if we are mostly clueless.

More ›