qsera

13 ms·

451.
by qsera 4mo ago
>There is zero current evidence that benevolent governments will own the robots, But that is up to the people and their governments to decide. You seem to miss the fact that governments are made by people and for the people, and not made
452.
by qsera 4mo ago
Sure, but that is missing the bigger point. The point is that the rich has become rich by serving the society enormously (It does not matter if someone become rich by serving ad, and thus not serving in the ideal sense, yet some member of t
453.
by qsera 4mo ago
Show me a picture of working class people building roads on their own initiative without a billionaire paying them.
454.
by qsera 4mo ago
By free, I mean "free of human effort"
455.
by qsera 4mo ago
>They still need to be fed though, energy, iron, etc. But just like humans can help each other, robots could help each other too. This includes digging up various resources, finding means of power generation etc..
456.
by qsera 4mo ago
>but you have to pay for the privilege too... You are not considering the fact that if there are robots to do everything, then they won't be interested in you paying them. This applies to the programs that you listed as well. The eq
457.
by qsera 4mo ago
>If the people aren't needed then why dedicate robots and land to feed them, for free? As I said in another comment, I think the governments should see to it that people are comfortable. It will also make it illegal to privately own
458.
by qsera 4mo ago
>Why would someone who owns all of the power and resources share with you? Ideally governments will see to it. This also assumes that governments have a much larger army of robots than any private individual. Just like how governments ma
459.
by qsera 4mo ago
>Unless one of us happens to be a food producer we will both starve. We need our trade graph to be connected to resources we need.. How will you starve when the robots will produce food for everyone, for free? Isn't that the idea? &
460.
by qsera 4mo ago
> No, the working class built the roads. Are you serious? That is pretty naive! >Explain how Putin (Russia's riches man).. Look at the money in your pocket. Do you know how it got there? There is one and only one way to get it. D
461.
by qsera 4mo ago
Isn't that the ultimate reason to be rich? Isn't the ultimate incentive? The rich have built roads, infrastructure, done research and improve QoL for everyone. We payed them and they grew even more rich. And when the judgement day
462.
by qsera 4mo ago
"Paper folds in a straight line" and I was like "duh! what else?" Until I read this comment, and it bought back all the memories where I tried to fold other things like plastic sheets and tin foils and how they never end
463.
by qsera 4mo ago
Sorry, I find the articles pretty shallow. Of course I don't expect better from an LLM, but you should know it. I would suggest not answering you childs questions using stuff directly from LLM. You should think about it, make up your m
464.
by qsera 4mo ago
A models adherence to some configuration is a matter of probability. There might be some underlying pattern, but as far as I understand this is not documented and it may be even impossible to do so. So people are just trying stuff and shari
465.
by qsera 4mo ago
In this thread: People tossing coins independently and fighting over the result they got.
466.
by qsera 4mo ago
At least with fire, you know when you are getting burned.
467.
by qsera 4mo ago
What do you mean? People are going to rush to get a subscription when this ban eventually lift. Brilliant marketing!
468.
by qsera 4mo ago
And mine "You can be incompetent and become the POTUS twice!"
469.
by qsera 4mo ago
I would also want all conversation with AI to be public, searchable and indexable. It is only fair, give that LLMs are enabled by human generated content from the Internet, that they give it back!
470.
by qsera 4mo ago
until the money runs out...
471.
by qsera 4mo ago
Actually I am one of them, and I am thankful for the people who are true believers of AI marketing. Your payments and subscription keeps the LLMS free for people like me who use it as a better search and use it to learn a lot of new things
472.
by qsera 4mo ago
Couldn't this be done by having an update log with a timestamp?
473.
by qsera 4mo ago
Yea, that is it. It is sad that people easily write off memory of nice things as "nostaliga"! Somethings really were nice.
474.
by qsera 4mo ago
It is not nostalgia.
475.
by qsera 4mo ago
>It was also incredibly difficult. And we dumb kids used to play it without the manual. It was a minor victory day for us when we finally figured out how to pick up the sword!
476.
by qsera 4mo ago
The graphics of Prince of persia took me to those dungeons more effectively than any 4k ray traced modern game could...
477.
by qsera 4mo ago
>This was the science fiction of our childhoods. That is the thing I am mad about. We are getting bastardized versions of the science fictions of our childhood. I fantasized about instant communicators across worlds, and we get mobile ph
478.
by qsera 4mo ago
Yea man. That is what sensible people do. Use these as a better search, and use it to lookup, and learn stuff while YOU do stuff. And make maximum use of it to learn as much as possible, while it lasts...
479.
by qsera 4mo ago
>humans in general reasoning If this happens then LLMs will fix every human problems. It will have cured cancers, solved the pollution and global warming problem, solved wars, and it no one will ever have to work again. Who cares if anyo
480.
by qsera 4mo ago
I wonder if it be possible for pi to support cheap older generation of RAM modules? And thus use recycled RAM from old computers from scrap?

More ›