qsera

16 ms·

481.
by qsera 4mo ago
It is quite easy to get the government do if the people really want it. Just stop using a car. Stop buying gas. Stop consuming the stuff and cause business real pain. Then the government will listen. Because businesses, not people, are what
482.
by qsera 4mo ago
> Speed is the major limiting factor for high-level automation. Yes, but the point is the quality of inference is more important than speed. What good is speed if inference is shit?
483.
by qsera 4mo ago
But the winner didn't remove the tree. They just built a an AI team of tree-cutters...
484.
by qsera 4mo ago
Because I am a human and I have motivation, incentive to not mess up.
485.
by qsera 4mo ago
What? You don't want your kids be familar with parental tracking so that they can graduate seamlessly into government tracking?
486.
by qsera 4mo ago
Of course, megapixels are also useful if you want to print large sizes.
487.
by qsera 4mo ago
It is pretty meaningless for something that calls itself intelligent.
488.
by qsera 5mo ago
Tokens per seconds is the "Megapixels" of AI marketing!
489.
by qsera 5mo ago
Yea, I did this using a raps-pi as well. Rasp-pi is nice in the sense that it can run a web server to select/enqueue/blacklist/ and what not. I can also ssh to it to download songs and automatically add to the playlist... Alo
490.
by qsera 5mo ago
Because there are patterns everywhere!
491.
by qsera 5mo ago
Because in its training data there is information on how to map from documentation of a language to actual programs. This means that following the pattern it can map between documentation for any language to programs in that language. But I
492.
by qsera 5mo ago
>is the LLM is able to represent things in space It is imitating the text written by humans who can represent things in space.
493.
by qsera 5mo ago
More like being suspended by a thread...
494.
by qsera 5mo ago
That is what I meant when I said it does not work.
495.
by qsera 5mo ago
This is not very surprising. The docs you write can only help if the person who is reading it have the same mental model of what ever thing that is being documented. Because the questons they want answered arises from what ever little subse
496.
by qsera 5mo ago
>than this will occur and generate a positive feedback loop that grows over time. And despite this, modern life is made possible by the illusion that "regulations" work..
497.
by qsera 5mo ago
He is probably paid to make that argument. Nothing spreads the idea that "X could be true", better than the putting forward of controversial argument that "X is not true".
498.
by qsera 5mo ago
Yes, it might be like watching Trump (or really all the news). If you keep at it 24x7 you ll feel that the sky will fall down in a couple of days. But if you stop watching him for like a month, nothing of consequence happens (mostly). Maybe
499.
by qsera 5mo ago
Obviously, we only considering about a honest human here.
500.
by qsera 5mo ago
Even worse is what the screen is showing...Every new animation on youtube appear to involve some toilet reference, like if I look up dinosaur cartoons, most of the hits will be showing farting dinosaurs or potty training dinosaurs with anim
501.
by qsera 5mo ago
>won’t rely on fully hand-written software if cheaper automated alternatives are good enough. By this logic, all non-outsourced development should be dead already.
502.
by qsera 5mo ago
>No, it did not. It did. In the form of a pattern that humans are too incapable of recongizing. LLMs identify and repeat the pattern. That is all. For example, if A -> B and B -> C, logic dictates A -> C. But LLMs will be able t
503.
by qsera 5mo ago
> easy to spot if you're ready for it Are you serious? LLMs, being a computer program, should always "be ready"? Unless you want to also claim that LLMs can be rushed, panicked, tired or can have a "bad day"! Jes
504.
by qsera 5mo ago
>I meant that humans are vulnerable to malicious input too. No they are not. Social engineering won't work on a human security expert who knows and understands the implications of the information they are giving away. Your analogy i
505.
by qsera 5mo ago
A human being who states X (implying they know it to be true) will behave in a way that is consistent with X being true. An LLM will happily say X and behaves in contradiction to X. Because it does not reason. Its behavior is not derived fr
506.
by qsera 5mo ago
Actually they are asking programmers to become managers in addition to programmers. Because when the LLMs stops working, they are expected to take over. So I think programmers who are asked to use LLMs should demand their job descriptions t
507.
by qsera 5mo ago
> Ever heard of social engineering? Oh wait, I thought these things were super smart. I didn't expect "social engineering" to work on them. > models nowadays are way sharper than they were even a year ago. You are missi
508.
by qsera 5mo ago
People who demand programmers start using LLMs in their work don't understand that it is essentially like asking programmers to start doing accounting or HR. Something fundamentally different from what they love to do..
509.
by qsera 5mo ago
>would refuse to use an effective tool. No one said I don't use LLMs. I use LLMs daily...for search. That is its best use. That is my own judgement.
510.
by qsera 5mo ago
Ever heard of "prompt injection" attacks? This "super intelligent" and "capable" thing cannot even understand that your ssh keys are private and should not be sent to randos. It can solve complex math, but does

More ›