qsera

14 ms·

421.
by qsera 4mo ago
So that is why I said teachers should be compensated well but may be by other means than paying out a large sum as salary. For example, if you were able to get free education for your children as part of your payment, wouldn't that hav
422.
by qsera 4mo ago
While true, not all jobs are equally critical in that regard. A bad programmer probably can be detected easily. But the effects of a generation of bad teachers might only show up after many decades!
423.
by qsera 4mo ago
Because those who are attracted by the high pay might not be the best ones to do the job.
424.
by qsera 4mo ago
> I would have loved to have a conversation with those books. I am not sure. It would be like sending a kid to a beautiful garden with full of life and stuff, and then micromanaging what they can do there! The beauty of the books is that
425.
by qsera 4mo ago
I am conflicted on this. One part of me think that they deserve a lot more compensation. But I am not really sure if that should be in the form of a salary rise.
426.
by qsera 4mo ago
> figure out how to organise society to deal with it. Yea, need to figure out to form society with participants who are incapable of thinking... And to make matters worse the LLMs that is causing this cannot even really think!
427.
by qsera 4mo ago
>Hell, looking back at the brilliant individuals, they had many, many grey areas. That is exactly the point. Back then that could exist. Now, we would just cancel them for one of the grey areas.
428.
by qsera 4mo ago
We have always sucked, but there used to be individual brilliance. Now everyone is the same shade of grey...
429.
by qsera 4mo ago
What exactly is false?
430.
by qsera 4mo ago
> it seems highly likely that they will be able to "invent" things based on feedback they receive while working towards goals... I don't think so. Imagine a model trained on data from an Internet that believes in hypothesi
431.
by qsera 4mo ago
Invention, discovery..does not matter. There was a point in time when humanity was oblivious to the phenomenon and then there was a point when we were not and we could generate and use it.
432.
by qsera 4mo ago
Those are the specific inventions.
433.
by qsera 4mo ago
Electricity, RF communication, LASERS, Transistors....
434.
by qsera 4mo ago
It does not think at all. It vibes based on its training and any additional bolted on constraints. It is a quite simple automation that only works by huge amount of existing data. Modern man has grown quite dumb. He only seems to be able to
435.
by qsera 4mo ago
Mmm..interesting..So now people are finding behavior patterns in LLMs which are trained on behavior patterns of people...
436.
by qsera 4mo ago
So you elect leaders to make those "political" decisions. I don't see the problem here. I think no politician or leader would say that they are "obviously" right, but they don't have to be. That is what a leade
437.
by qsera 4mo ago
So that is their, possibly biased, opinion.
438.
by qsera 4mo ago
What is your point man? Can you state simply? Is it that cutting funding for "science" is bad, without exception?
439.
by qsera 4mo ago
> It's the coordinated dismantling of structural components of America's innovation economy in ways that will take decades to recover from, No, that is just your opinion.
440.
by qsera 4mo ago
Get a load of this guy here. He thinks that humans beings cannot communicate if some computer programs does not talk in their language!
441.
by qsera 4mo ago
Not very smart. I would go further and say that even full unicode support could be avoided and a software can still be massively useful. It is sad that the world is so hung up on unicode and things like accessibility that we all have to sub
442.
by qsera 4mo ago
I just want to say that what you say makes a lot of sense to me and I am happy people like you are pushing against the narrative.
443.
by qsera 4mo ago
The problem is that many people recognize it for what it is (not real AI), and they are against society paying large cost for its advancement AS IF it is true AI or a path to it.
444.
by qsera 4mo ago
Your comment made we wonder what happens when the AI company's new model does not have a dramatic improvement and have just knowledge updates, and majority of the users does not upgrade? Given the enormous cost of training, would it be
445.
by qsera 4mo ago
The government at least has to maintain the appearance.
446.
by qsera 4mo ago
> Might Money gives you purchasing power. Is that surprising?
447.
by qsera 4mo ago
>If you think about it states are not much different than corporations. At least democracies have elections and that is a big difference.
448.
by qsera 4mo ago
I am thinking of a case where governments will own the robots. People will pay some minimal tax to pay for the maintenance of the robots. If other robots can be made to do it, then even that cost is saved. Government will, among other thing
449.
by qsera 4mo ago
But then why hasn't governments and the rich already collaborated converted all of us plebs into slaves? If that has not happened already then why do you think so pessimistically?
450.
by qsera 4mo ago
>Your statement, as written, ignores that much wealth, power, privilege is inherited from ill-gotten gains like savage conquest, slavery, oppression, corruption, etc. and most great wealth is held by people who had extreme advantages fro

More ›