Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
qsera
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
301.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
One that makes sense.
302.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>Please allow me an opportunity to enlighten you: So I am aware. The "we" is important because I said "accurately". When "we" set up the recording, we can make it to record with the required precision. Infer
303.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>Polluted cities getting cleaner for some. Clean rivers and beautiful forests getting poisounous ore pits for others. Yes, that is how it goes. Right now all the "intellectuals" and "thought leaders" are in EV apologe
304.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
> without good reason
305.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
> That applies to things you're experiencing on a daily basis. That we cannot accurately look into the past unless we explicitly record it, is something that I experience on a daily basis. Seriously, if you are so convinced, then wh
306.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
"how much they last" does not play a part in the recycle load the industry will have to handle though...
307.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>countries where enforcement is lax As an Indian this is exactly one of the reasons why I am afraid of EV boom. All of that bad stuff, which we are mostly unfamiliar with (in terms of how to handle it properly, because battery tech is a
308.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
Accept? Why should any one "accept" anything without good reason?
309.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
None. It goes against my common sense. That is why I am asking what accuracy can this method give. I am asking that to people who are already seemingly convinced that the methods listed (fossil records, ice-cores) can be accurate..
310.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
See, since it seems that you are convinced yourselves, can you tell me how accurately the past temperature can be assessed by using this method? I mean +/- how many degrees? Also share if this accuracy requires any implicit assumptions
311.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
But those are unreliable as well... See, since it seems that you are convinced yourselves, can you tell me how accurately the past temperature can be assessed by using this method? I mean +/- how many degrees?
312.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>What’s the point of scanning function by function, line by line? Because a critical bug could be anywhere, even in a simple function. Particularly when it is written by an LLM. Who knows when it chooses to have a bad hallucination?
313.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>For complex code changes or bigger features I often spend hours with an LLM refining architecture The problem here is that the LLM hallucinates, so * it will tell that something is a bad idea, even when it is not. * it will miss good id
314.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
It is not really surprising that skeptics exist when the answers they get are of these sort...
315.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>Past precipitation can be used to reconstruct past palaeoclimatic temperatures. δD and δ18O is related to surface temperature at middle and high latitudes. The relationship is consistent and linear over Antarctica[9]... I think this is
316.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>historic CO2 levels -> historic average global temps But this seems to imply that global temperatures are only dependent on CO2 levels. That is a pretty flawed assumption...
317.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>AI is the continuation of the computer revolution. Yes, it is a vastly efficient search technique using fast computers.
318.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
Not really. I only reject using them for certain things that require vastly more reliable data. And I am not making the mistake of relying on unreliable data just because it is the best we can manage. Also why don't you answer my quest
319.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
That does not look very reliable to me, because that implies certain things are only affected by ambient temperature. Btw, Can you tell me how ancient temperature is measured from ice cores? My lookup only says we can detect atmospheric com
320.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
But there is no way to confirm that those methods are accurate...
321.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
Don't worry. A lot of people were captivated by computers and programming before it ever became profitable. A lot of them will continue to be, even after it does not pay well..
322.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>Keyboards require learning We are not talking about keyboard shortcuts (key combinations that you press to do something) by the way, and about the actual typing of commands in the terminal/shell/repl what ever...
323.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>Your "flow" is just habits, things you've taught yourself to do By this logic a person who were comfortable with mouse should never grow to like VIM. > there is no "natural" or "intuitive" way to op
324.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
> do better than state slavery. The point is the exploitation of the masses and the ensuing concentration of wealth is the enabler. Sure we might find a way to do that without Ads...
325.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
I hate ads of all kinds and I hate targeted manipulations of all kinds. But that does not stop me from recognizing the part it plays in the world. That shouldn't stop you either. > we wouldn't have charities, freedom of thought
326.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
Not sure what you find funny about it. >Those ancient wonders were enabled by slave labor That is exactly the point.
327.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
Advertisements actually run the world. Imagine a world without ads. The economy would grind to a halt. It is exploitation and manipulation, but that enables creation of large capital, which leads to great things. In the past it was pyramids
328.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
And thank you for demonstrating mine..
329.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
> to detect an effect significantly stronger than most drugs.. What the heck are you smokin? Did paracetamol have a weaker affect on temperature than smoking causing cancer?
330.
▲
by
qsera
3mo ago
>because that information is indistinguishable from noise. Not if the signal is strong. Whether a thing works or not, is a pretty strong signal. Your equating it to bad effects of smoking is flawed and is not comparable. You other arugme
More ›