qpricjalcbeu

4 ms·

1.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
But then you're trying to time the market which goes against the passiveness approach that most people sign up to when they buy these sort of ETFs.
2.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
Idk, I kinda agree with Matt Levine. The purpose of these ETFs is conceptually to track the "largest X companies", so including SPCX is just staying true to that. If there's an issue I think it's earlier in the IPO pipel
3.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
But how is that better than a single agent searching those "angles" sequentially? Unless they are orthogonal they most likely require similar context anyway so multiple sub agent is just wasteful.
4.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
And in my experience the sub agent performance is usually worse than just a single agent.
5.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
Zuck was part of that team.
6.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
Yeah, no thanks. I cannot think of a worse company to trust with additional personal data.
7.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
Weren't they caught multiple times gaming the benchmark even more so then the rest?
8.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
So convert those buildings to giant dorms. Lots of younger people would be more than happy with such an option (as long as it's priced accordingly of course) Can also combine with capsule hotels.
9.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1w21gn340xo
10.
by qpricjalcbeu 3mo ago
They aren't cynical, just disingenuous. Google was providing cloud computing to the DoD before 2017 - there's no real morale difference between providing lower level compute vs providing a higher level AI algo other than giving yo