Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
q-big
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> It also encourages slavery. Indeed, if slavery turned out to be more efficient, it would. But I think that the claim that slavery is more efficient does not hold, since opressing people binds a lot of ressources; also opressed people t
92.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> What's the value in a spyware ridden laptop? Pre-installing spyware gives money to the vendor of the laptop. The developer of the spyware can afford to give this money to the laptop vendor since he can use the collected data to ma
93.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> If I don't buy anything, I'm out of the market system and the whole argument of "the market is best" falls down: it means the market hasn't solved my problem. This means the vendor makes no money from you. If a
94.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> but [the market] will not decide whether the 10 smartphones are needed or what kind of smartphone are needed. This is what buyers decide about via their buying decisions.
95.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> Efficiency in this case defined as "extracting as much money from consumers at as low a cost as possible", not "providing as much value as possible to consumers at as low a price as possible". "providing as mu
96.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> I don't like Android, I don't like iOS. What do I buy ? Not buying is also a possible decision. You should of course choose this choice if all other available option have a negative net value for you. The fact that you decide
97.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
In the sense that those who are willing to pay the most get preferred resource allocation in a way that is self-adjusting. If a company is able to pay more for their commodities, it means that it is able to create more of an economic value
98.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> And increasingly, consumers have become resources rather than market participants. By their buying decisions, they actively decide that this is what they want.
99.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> The free market has always been a fable. The whole economic system is not geared towards maximization of consumers' quality of life No economist would claim that (and I seriously ask from where you got the "markets maximize c
100.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> What about your children's social/well-being from not interacting with their peers? With "social skills", you mean either tolerating bullying or becoming a bully? (Compulsary) school is a prison, so the only social
101.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> MIPS, Itanium, SPARC and POWER all have weak memory models. This does not seem to hold for SPARC: according to > https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pes20/weakmemory/x86tso-paper.tpho... the (strong) memory models o
102.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> You can have the very best decompiler in the world and you're still going to be a rounding error compared to companies like Figma, because (1) not that many people use disassemblers (1) could be changed by making a decent offer to
103.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
I agree that a web browser is an abstraction over some parts of what an OS offers. But a web browser is clearly not an operating system.
104.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> "Sometimes I think the new OS is not going to start from the hardware, because the classic OS definition, that Tanenbaum, one of the guys who wrote the book on Operating Systems that I read when I went to school was: “It does two
105.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> Are they culling microsoft teams? Pun intended?
106.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> Is tech still counter culture now that it pervades every place in society? Tech is not counter culture (and has in my personal observation never really been). Hacker culture, on the other hand, was counterculture from beginning on and
107.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> There are even more secrets that were discovered in recent years that aren't in the talk. Could you give details?
108.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> If by "online algorithm" you mean incremental learning, the problem is that they still don't work well due to catastrophic forgetting... I rather think that with "online algorithm", gnull means exactly this cl
109.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> If you also consider parts of the world like Europe where the price of electricity more than doubled and the power consumption of 4xxx series (practically secondary room heaters) Considering the worries about heating in the winter this
110.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> What is the Slashvertisement? I assume that it is a portmanteu of "Slashdot" ( https://slashdot.org/ ) and "advertisement".
111.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> Yeah, I think people underestimate the compelling nature of diverse expression. In my experience whether they find this compelling depends a lot on the respective person. "Manager types" might like it, but quite some programm
112.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> They did make good on this. You can make Meta accounts with arbitrary emails and there's no connection to Facebook or real name stuff. Can you also use the Meta headsets without creating any account?
113.
▲
PayPal fining users up to $2500 for promoting misinformation was sent in error
(finance.yahoo.com)
2 points
by
q-big
4y ago
|
4 comments
114.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> Sorry, Feynman, whatever else he did, on probability he gets a grade of flat F. Here is why: In his book Lectures on Physics he states that a particle of unknown location has a probability density uniform over all of space. No it doesn
115.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> It's like driving a car; you do not have to be a engineer to drive one; but the more you want to push the limits of performance, the more you need to know about the details. This is a potential argument why users don't have
116.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> or don't want to rock the boat too much by not having any. Why is "not having children" rocking the boat. Intuitively, I would rather argue that (for example because of reasons outlined by the GP) having children means
117.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> Because it is mathematically equivalent to the others. Observationally indistinguishable. By Occam's Razor, if there exist multiple theories that are indistinguishable, we should take the one that has minimal assumptions (i.e. no
118.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> If someone were to show me a simple mathematical expression as defined above, I would be open to it. As far as I can tell, all this article is saying is "maybe it's possible". Finding such a simple mathematical expressio
119.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
I cannot understand why superdeterminism is so much frowned upon while the many-worlds interpretation is considered to be perfectly fine. I rather think the same standard should be applied to both.
120.
▲
by
q-big
4y ago
> QM can't be based on LOCAL hidden variables. ... as long as we assume that the system being measured is uncorrelated with the choices of which measurements to make on it. :-)
More ›