pythononwheels

5 ms·

1.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Of course the reliable foundation is important. But my main point was to have a fluent workflow. That's also why I want to add a mongoDB backend. (as well) I am also thinking of moving the Views completely to javascript (ejs would probably
2.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
No problem, I just took the standard Bootstrap layout. But right, the red info box is a little heavy weight. But I like to point out that this is not meant to be production ready, yet. Anyway I am not a Designer. I like my blog template, th
3.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Yes, and I am currently working on a mongoDB backend. So newest devel is in the mongoDB branch. (Last updated Feb 13.2013)
4.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
NDB is a good hint. But the problem remains that I want PoW to be able to support SQL DBs also. I think SQLAlchemy is a really mature framework for that area. So I need to generate the models in two ways.. I think I need to separate this a
5.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
I think flask is ment to be really micro. Misses ( and wants to miss IMO ) the generative approach. Also misses ( and wants to ) the db layer etc So these approaches are really different. Code: i will cleanup and DRY the generatots. But gen
6.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Doesn't want to be better but more generative, so quicker first app results. Idea is to add many rails-alike helpers like pagination, observation, etc... Easing small apps life .;)
7.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Really works fine from really many different devices for me... Damn i really dont wanr to ask if you can replicate thsi .. 'cause you can. But i just cant advice something other than to try a different browser... Should work with safari, f
8.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Hi, no problem, Project names are really funny. I didnt know them.. Thx and regards, Khz
9.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Pep8 => yes, need to review / rewrite Dry => again yes, working currently on it for generate_* did you look at some genrated code, think this is cleaner, though. The generators are the oldest .. Thx, khz
10.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Intersting that you chose a different framework for almost any field. So there is room ;) I am thinking about a google app engine port but sqlalchemy is a showstopper here .. Need the models to talk GQL ... So i stopped that port for now. M
11.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
1 point by pythononwheels 7 minutes ago | link | edit | delete Hey oinksoft. Dont just punch on top... To your points: 1. The shebang: yes, ouch, gets removed. 2. Pow_console: it is a remark that i too, code from there. I always comment the
12.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
One important remark: if you check it out from github, be sure to get the Beta1 branch. The master branch is really long behind the current development. I also stated that in the screencast. And as i think about it, some of the comments mig
13.
by pythononwheels 14y ago
Hi, I wrote the PoW framework. And want to give some short feedback on the comments here. Yes, i need to get things cleaned up. Shebangs are old and not used. So can and will be dropped. Good point i really forgot they were still there. Yes