pxoe

17 ms·

181.
by pxoe 3y ago
maybe they should build a better LLM? maybe they could ask the AI to make a better system. after all, tech and ai is so powerful that they could do virtually anything, except having accountability as it turns out.
182.
by pxoe 3y ago
that just sounds like "we didn't even try to build those systems in that way, and we're all out of ideas, so it basically will never work" which is really just a very, very common story with ai problems, be it sources&#x
183.
by pxoe 3y ago
open source won't care. they'll just use data anyway. closed/proprietary services that also monetize - there's a question whether it's "fair" to take and use data for free, and then basically resell access
184.
by pxoe 3y ago
>"Can you stand up?" would be translated differently into Japanese depending on whether you're implying nitpicky, but is it though? not really. and it's as much 'difference depending on what you're implying&
185.
by pxoe 3y ago
Banning non-consensual nude imagery would "fix" that "broken system". The "game" would be fixed, if those games would be made illegal. So why don't you like that as a solution? Is it supposed to be just &q
186.
by pxoe 3y ago
and it's not making nudity illegal, it's about nonconsensual creation and distribution of images with nudity. which may be connected with bullying, blackmail, extortion, or may not be. >If a naked picture of you is causing you
187.
by pxoe 3y ago
some parts of east asia and middle east are much, much, Much worse. Not just "puritanistic" but down to "these kinds of people do not exist".
188.
by pxoe 3y ago
how's the rest of the world dealing with those things?
189.
by pxoe 3y ago
does that change that "it's an app", "it's a thing", "it's a program", "it's an intermediary"? no. technobabble just doesn't change some fundamentals.
190.
by pxoe 3y ago
it's not the "unaware" part, it's the 'endless possibilities' (snake oil) part. ai ppl looooove to draw clouds and expect everyone to buy into that shit, yet it's not that hot. it'll always be just an
191.
by pxoe 3y ago
typing some text and pressing 'generate', iterating, or doing layering and photobashing, just isn't gonna be 'painting', or 'drawing', like, ever. on a fundamental level. you'll need to get over yours
192.
by pxoe 3y ago
you're a meme. do you "see" why artists are mad? it's quite simple. artists offer to make their art for a price, as a 'service'. then, something comes in, that pirated their previous works, and offers to make i
193.
by pxoe 3y ago
as much as this doomer drivel might be true, it might be blinding you to the good parts and good people. just not seeing what's "novel and interesting", nor seeking it out.
194.
by pxoe 3y ago
they might, either about pre-ai internet, or the early ai / early widespread ai, when it was widely available and accessible, and not (yet?) legislated into oblivion or hasn't yet destroyed entire industries
195.
by pxoe 3y ago
this kind of question really illustrates techbro level of understanding of art. like damn, it is hopeless. and some deeper inability to flip it to oneself that results in shit takes like that. 'is whatever that I'm creating that r
196.
by pxoe 3y ago
that's just creating your own curated little bubble.
197.
by pxoe 3y ago
sometimes people quite literally settle for something worse or just 'mediocre', when they could have something good, something better, something they actually wanted and desired. but nope, people settle for something middling &#x2
198.
by pxoe 3y ago
what is that "payoff"? why is that "payoff", whatever that is, something to seek out and prioritize? does it have to be about having "something to get"?
199.
by pxoe 3y ago
pretty much nothing about rethinking licenses specifically, or how that involves AI. whole lotta nothing, just 'trade secrets good'
200.
by pxoe 3y ago
when cookies are disabled (cookie whitelisting), the website doesn't show anything at all. could have a 'enable cookies/site data storage pls' message at least
201.
by pxoe 3y ago
It's just some people seeking to pit mastodon and threads against each other, no matter what with no limit to dishonesty when it's "against a big bad corporation". Sure, they can go ahead, it just might look ridiculous.
202.
by pxoe 3y ago
>relatively active on mastodon ah yes, with a whopping 2 to 4 posts for the last week (about a dozen or two for a whole month), and a grand total of 50-100 posts. while some other accounts on that server haven't posted anything sinc
203.
by pxoe 3y ago
yep, having just two bars - tabs + window buttons, and omnibox + browser buttons (which were also condensed just to 'page' and 'settings'), was kinda huge. at that time, (when browsers like firefox 3 and ie8 were around)
204.
by pxoe 3y ago
that paragraph about optima is so strange
205.
by pxoe 3y ago
on discovery, at some point they turned tag pages from paginated into endlessly scrolling kind, and that's been one of the worst thing one could do for discovery. no longer can you actually browse the catalog top to bottom, you're
206.
by pxoe 3y ago
if all that makes their phones secure is "not allowing sideloading" or "not allowing different browser engines", then that's a pretty shit security
207.
by pxoe 3y ago
it doesn't really vibe with quick (hell, just fast-ish) strokes across the screen, trying to just write with a pen on screen results in a bunch of dots (strokes with missing pixels inbetween), so one has to move really slow. (maybe it
208.
by pxoe 3y ago
how is something that _isn't_ shadowbanning, somehow a "level" of "shadowbanning"? no, a platform not promoting posts, and a platform hiding posts and making them not visible to anyone else at all, are not the same
209.
by pxoe 3y ago
idk if some of those things are "shadowbanning" per se but more like limiting reach and promotion. there's the confusion (unaware or intentional) between 'getting actually shadowbanned, as in, your posts actually do not
210.
by pxoe 3y ago
well, try going for deletion of all location history and see how that goes for 'the most visible control'

More ›