pwillia7

33 ms·

421.
by pwillia7 5y ago
I feel like you would definitely notice the broken white lane lines ... You can see it pretty well in the uncompressed version.
422.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Whatever happened to our benevolent anonymous hacker groups that were supposed to be so organic and decentralized they could never be ended?
423.
by pwillia7 5y ago
I went and watched it and it was actually the Countach that had that
424.
by pwillia7 5y ago
I fully agree. The difference is the value exchange. At a normal bank they just want to charge you fees because you cost them money. Fidelity lets you keep your money with them in the hopes that as you grow your money, you'll spend it
425.
by pwillia7 5y ago
good bader meinhoff
426.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Thanks! Next JS has a starter kit for a few different platforms called nextjs commerce - https://nextjs.org/commerce Getting to PWA would probably be pretty simple since you just need a service worker to qualify if I rememb
427.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Awesome! Since this is using next, could you build an ecommerce site using this and the next integrations? Does this support PWA? You guys should have presented at nextjsconf last week!
428.
by pwillia7 5y ago
I mean the phone company bugged my neighbor's house but he let them set up his router so I guess that's fine.
429.
by pwillia7 5y ago
I was thinking of a similar analogy but I don't think it holds. The right analogy would be if I was in the apartment complex and I said to a door not mine "I'm home open up!" If the door opened and I did it intentionally
430.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Congrats! Been keeping an eye on you guys for a while. What kind of trade offs were involved in the direct listing? How confident were you that was the best way to list?
431.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Almost every other facet of the law rests somewhat on 'common sense' and what 'reasonable people would do' I don't see why the laws couldn't be like that, but I take your point.
432.
by pwillia7 5y ago
*purposeful loopholes
433.
by pwillia7 5y ago
What's the certainty there? Could you expand?
434.
by pwillia7 5y ago
I think this is a big problem for liberalism in the future. When we have 20 billion people and technology is more powerful and ubiquitous, big consequences could happen from individual bad actors remotely. Even if only the tiniest fraction
435.
by pwillia7 5y ago
OT -- I've noticed this personally too. I like to say 'steal' talking about ideas or tools or projects and I've noticed a lot of people will have a visceral reaction. It's similar to when you refer to socially accep
436.
by pwillia7 5y ago
What part of the market are you targeting? Up market, I worry a lot of system integrations are too custom/modified to really scale an 'easy migration' tool. Think of ERP for the best example but I see this constantly in ecomm
437.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Take a listen to James Burke chatting with Dan Carlin. A better job than I could do -- https://www.dancarlin.com/product/common-sense-312-re-connec...
438.
by pwillia7 5y ago
There's 152 other families to work as scabs for each striking worker. I worry all of this won't be resolved until the next State level paradigm shift, like when the world mostly did away with kings and queens for liberalism.
439.
by pwillia7 5y ago
You finally explained what draws me to emacs. Except org-mode. I feel if I could make org-mode a part of my life I could accomplish anything.
440.
by pwillia7 5y ago
we have a company directory with everyone's photo in it all employees can access. It's part of the HR onboard to put a photo in your profile day 1.
441.
by pwillia7 5y ago
I haven't laughed that hard since I saw that 5 years ago
442.
by pwillia7 5y ago
That's covered under 799 I think
443.
by pwillia7 5y ago
A simple Zoom call with your camera on for anything private could have stopped all of this.
444.
by pwillia7 5y ago
hey bro earnings gonna be good?
445.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Hey wait but those are for normal people!
446.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Yeah I was going to say -- just wait until this guy hears about org mode
447.
by pwillia7 5y ago
You don't even have to play. Just declare you win and if the other person agrees it's game over.
448.
by pwillia7 5y ago
Thanks -- I have used that word wrong too. I guess 'entirely' or 'completely' would be better
449.
by pwillia7 5y ago
It's weird how the 'infallible invisible hand of the market' folks don't believe in it in practice. All the 'isms' seem like convenient excuses to justify selfish behavior in whatever way suits the argument and
450.
by pwillia7 5y ago
just keep giving everyone more money Duh! /s

More ›