pwdisswordfish9

6 ms·

1.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
Got some links? Would love to read.
2.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
Why are you blathering about tea?
3.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
That depends on how selfish you are.
4.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
While I'm sure it's annoying, this post is not a good look and reads rather unhinged. I'm also not sure what it's meant to accomplish other than venting.
5.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
As if apple would have their services obey firewall restrictions.
6.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
The QuickDraw source code has been available for some time: < https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2285569 > Submitted several times to HN since then. Most recently: < https://news.ycombinator.com/ite
7.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> Parsing HTML isn’t trivial: aside from bad/invalid HTML (think: missing opening/closing tags, quotes, etc), there’s also a lot of content that requires javascript to render in the first place, for example, which means the pag
8.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
Speaking of Atom/RSS: There's no reason to have a separate /archives resource and a /feed.xml (with or without content negotiation). You can just specify some external XSLT with an xml-stylesheet processing instruction
9.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
https://www.w3.org/TR/tabular-data-primer/#dialects
10.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
A bookmarklet is more or less just a JS expression that executes on command (the user's, that is). The execution model is approximately the same as for content-delivered scripts, and it's subject to the same constraints. So, yes,
11.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
You don't need an extension to do that. You can get by with a bookmarklet, which would be wise, considering how much contempt browser makers have for extension authors.
12.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
They are approximately as big of a risk as any other third-party code you install from the Web onto your machine (e.g. tools from dev SDKs).
13.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
What is "OWF" here? Open Web Foundation? If so, that's such a weird choice to mention. It has approximately nothing to do with browser standards. It's not even as if it's a ceremonial figurehead or something. It
14.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> This promising engine [Servo] was developed by Mozilla[...] Mozilla fired a quarter of their developers, which apparently included the whole Servo team. There have still been some commits to the code since then (presumably by hobbyists
15.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> you can't just pick out the bits from the 1900's that you liked, and then abandon the bits you think you dont like, independently of each other Wait a second, sure you can. Why can't you? Your example isn't as goo
16.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
As always, it needs to be said that selection bias is a thing; these surveys do not show people who <blank> . They measure Stack Overflow users who <blank> (... and then responded to a request to complete a survey that has q
17.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
Everyone is quick to say something like, "You're not living by the same standards that were the norm 90 years ago." The response is wanting. Notably, it's not the same as saying, "You could work that much if y
18.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
So we agree that he didn't write it singlehandedly, then. jonah_hill_fuck_me_right?.jpg (We don't agree on the appropriateness of the description that he "was involved", however. That sounds like an attempt to understat
19.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> GitHub themselves say [1] Irrelevant. You're quoting docs.github.com, which is neither authoritative (docs are written to GitHub's documentation standards, not by their legal team), nor is it always up-to-date or well inform
20.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
Not true. It is an option by virtue of the fact that is a public repository. (If you fail to specify a license on a public repository, the terms that apply are not the default "all rights reserved [by the owner/creator]" th
21.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
If you "don't have an issue" with JavaScript but you think the tools you're using are bad because of the "depth of hole you can quickly end up in though is not to be underestimated", then perhaps you should rec
22.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> no substantial modern application can possibly be built without them Check out Firefox.
23.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
Instead of whinging you could just write your own script, if for some reason you're not okay with running the same code as tons of other people?
24.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> I never had the kinds of problems I have with JS with any other bloody languages and their respective build tools. lmao
25.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> Fabrice Bellard singlehandedly wrote a JavaScript interpreter that No he didn't.
26.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> I don't know what the dynamics are for WordPress plugin developers to write this much vulnerable code 1. Random person who doesn't know anything about computers has stumbled their way into having a wordpress site 2. This pers
27.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> I suspect it could be a ChatGPT or some variant Either that, or someone who is absolutely clueless. Would be nice to not have such drivel on the HN frontpage.
28.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
> if it is a general improvement and not just a hack around a driver bug And that's why linux on nvidia is doomed.
29.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
They shouldn't forget to skip leg day.
30.
by pwdisswordfish9 4y ago
What does that pattern match that the following simplification doesn't? /(^(\d+)(\.)?(\d+)?)|(^(\.)(\d+))/

More ›